this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
146 points (97.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63271 readers
124 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Cox did not profit from its subscribers' acts of infringement," judges rule.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a bizarre stock photo choice too! Someone had a lot of fun with that 😄

[–] los_chill@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

For real. Are they trying to make me NOT want to be that guy, cause...

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But still declared them liable for the actions of their users.

Bad ruling, just less bad than it could be.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Next up: Cox bans torrenting traffic and known VPN IP ranges.

[–] kindenough@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Access to internet is a basic human right. Sony doesn't honor basic human rights when it wants people kicked off internet because money.

[–] Cyberbatman@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the Yee Side!.... ARRRRGG!