this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
29 points (82.2% liked)

politics

25346 readers
2042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Many top Democrats are convinced that if the election were today, Biden would lose a rematch with former President Trump. Biden's address on March 7 is his biggest chance to shift public perceptions.

"Everyone around him is well aware — well aware — of the need to jack this campaign up," a source close to Biden said. "The only way to deal with the negative aftershocks of the special counsel's report [slamming Biden's age] is for the president to be out there, to be visible — to be strong of presence and strong of voice."

One bold move that Biden has considered, we're told, is an executive order that would dramatically stanch the record flow of migrants into the Southwest. This could even happen in the two weeks before the address, allowing Biden to say he took action while Republicans just talk.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I fucking hate this timeline. It is either Biden, or Trump. Those are our options. That's it. Either a babling idiot or... an orange babling idiot. Has there ever been such bad options before? I am so sick of it. It feels like there is someone behind the scenes pulling the strings just to see how fucking ridiculous this can all get before we rise up. Maybe someone is testing the waters for something in the future. Just to see how much they can toy with us. Maybe it's all just the elite rich shoving whatever politician they can in that gives them the most control. I mean, we all know that is happenning, but maybe it is just becoming more and more brazen as they realize how much we all just..... complain and do nothing substantial to stop it.

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago

Genocide or Genocide+.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

It feels like there is someone behind the scenes pulling the strings just to see how fucking ridiculous this can all get before we rise up.

It's much scarier than that: This is actually what the American people want, and those of us who think it's wrong are a tiny minority.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think it's concerning that his memory is seemingly so bad that he forgot he said he'd be a one term president during the 2020 primary.

Keeping the same candidate isn't going to be much of a reset, even if I'd still vote for that candidate like my life and the lives of marginalized loved ones depend on it.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I too wish we had a different candidate, but I've never seen any quote from Biden that he would only serve one term. This seems to be an assumption that everyone has taken as fact? I've seen him say he's a bridge or transition president, but never "I will only serve 1 term". Can anybody point me to this? All I can find is that his aides suggested it and he came out and specifically said it wasn't true.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/joe-biden-denies-mulling-term-pledge-elected-president/story?id=67662497

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

One bold move that Biden has considered, we’re told, is an executive order that would dramatically stanch the record flow of migrants into the Southwest. This could even happen in the two weeks before the address, allowing Biden to say he took action while Republicans just talk.

Clearly the way to quiet concerns that he's old and out of touch is to become more conservative. Republicans being hypocrites doesn't make him younger, nor is it going to improve his numbers with the groups he's been losing who all have issues other than border crossings that motivate them. "People don't like me, what if I did something completely irrelevant to their concerns? That'd solve it right?"

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can't wait to see what his "fund the police" moment is gonna be this time. Wonder which previously valued constituency is going under the bus in order to fail to gain the approval of Republicans.