Who is making these idiotic decisions ?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Being bought by Fandango, and then wanting more brand recognition probably had something to do with it.
Vudu is a better name, but Fandango is a more recognizable name. I get it.
Still, they should just market Vudu more. Fandango at Home is a stupid name thought of by corporates. At least, it's not Fandango+ or whatever... which I'm sure was on their list.
"We have Fandango at home."
Fandango At Home at home:
And some upper manager probably got a bonus bigger than what I'll earn in a decade for this rebranding.
It’s like some kind of black hole powered by stupidity rather then gravity…
Gross.
This sounds even more embarrassing than Netflix and Chill.
Fan Dan Goat Home
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“We will still have the same great films, shows, deals, and bundles, plus your library will stay right where it’s always been,” the company said in a post on X (via 9to5Google).
Fandango shut down its previous FandangoNOW service when it scooped up Vudu, so perhaps it’s not a surprise that the company ultimately wanted its own name back in there.
Vudu has been a go-to for home theater enthusiasts over the years for several reasons.
Years ago, the company’s streaming bit rate and video fidelity was a step above most competitors.
And under Walmart’s stewardship, Vudu also launched unique programs like disc-to-digital, which allowed consumers to pay low prices to add movies to their digital locker — many of which would then be compatible with Movies Anywhere.
This initially required going into a Walmart store, but eventually Vudu streamlined the process to where you only needed a smartphone.
The original article contains 273 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 45%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Thank fucking god