Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
Umm.. this reeks of pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo. Doesn't help that the website is an "open" platform (i.e. doesn't have proper peer review or other safeguards).
Frankly, this has no place in a science community.
Authors are not conspiranoics
R. Joseph1*, C. Impey2, O. Planchon3, R. del Gaudio4, M. Abu Safa5, A.R. Sumanarathna6, E. Ansbro7, D. Duvall8, G. Bianciardi9, C. H. Gibson10, R. Schild11, 1Astrobiology Research Center, California, USA2Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 857213Biogéosciences laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France4Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy5Dept. of Applied Physics, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine6Dept. of Research and Innovation, Eco Astronomy International Research Center, Tetouan, Morocco7Space Exploration Ltd, Boyle, County Roscommon, Ireland.8Dept. of Zoology, Oklahoma State University (emeritus), Stillwater, OK, USA9Università degli Studi di Siena, Italy. 10Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California (emeritus), San Diego, USA11Center for Astrophysics, Harvard-Smithsonian (emeritus), Cambridge, MA, USA
Have you read the paper, also the references at the end? Or is that you belief more in little green mens instead of plasma phenomenons, which explains a lot of the Unidentified Flying Objects?
I did read it, in fact. I disagree with the methodology, as well as the unsubstantiated non scientific guesswork involved in reaching many of their conclusions.
This is nothing but speculation. It is not a rigorous analysis of empirical data. I'm short, it's not science.