this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
237 points (97.2% liked)

World News

49828 readers
1784 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The environmentally friendly LignaSat probe – set to orbit this summer – has been created to combat harmful aluminium particles

Japanese scientists have created one of the world’s most unusual spacecraft – a tiny satellite that is made of timber.

The LignoSat probe has been built of magnolia wood, which, in experiments carried out on the International Space Station (ISS), was found to be particularly stable and resistant to cracking. Now plans are being finalised for it to be launched on a US rocket this summer.

The timber satellite has been built by researchers at Kyoto University and the logging company Sumitomo Forestry in order to test the idea of using biodegradable materials such as wood to see if they can act as environmentally friendly alternatives to the metals from which all satellites are currently constructed.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

God I can just see the team of little old Craftsmen widdling away at it for months forming all the toolless joints with sub-millimeter accuracy

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

People forget for a long time japan built houses without nails or machinery.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They don't last very long though, they are not particularly energy efficient, and they are single story.

It's not like they have a superior manufacturing technique.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I would have thought that space debris is deadly no matter if it's made of wood or metal. If something comes at you at a few kilometers a second, it doesn't really matter what material it is.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The goal isn't preventing the whole "lots of tiny pieces moving around could collide with you" issue.

The article mentions that aluminium fragments from space debris, upon reentry, end up damaging the ozone layer. The wooden ones do not.

[–] THE_MASTERMIND@feddit.ch -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

But wouldn't the wooden one catch fire and unlike aluminium it won't just stop burning after it enters the atmosphere would it ?

EDIT :Oh i just got it its a satelite they don't have to bring it back i think

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, on re-entry. But the idea is probably that it's less environmentally damaging than its metal counterparts burning up on re-entry.

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think there's much that stops burning on re-entry.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It would mostly disperse into ash on re-entry, which has a low terminal velocity.

[–] CubitOom 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would wood splintering cause more small projectiles than if it were made of contemporary materials? Maybe the strength of the projectiles being less than metal might help if it were to hit a space station, but an astronaut on a space walk would have a different story.

[–] Evrala@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you read the article, it's because the tiny particles of carbon from the wood are less damaging for the environment then filling the upper atmosphere with aluminum particles when they burn up upon reentry.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Lignocellulose

[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

First thought as well 😂

[–] Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

They were half a letter off. We were so close to perfection

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, so steampunk evolves in outer space... That kinda makes more sense

If we can choose the materials of our space transport then I want gingerbread and marshmallows.

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Outer Wilds Ventures approves of this announcement.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

of course they launch an origami satellite, the brilliant bastards

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Wood is not biodegradable in space. What are they on about? A wooden satellite would not be environmentally friendly debris. It would just be wooden debris

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 24 points 2 years ago

It's for reentry. Normal satellite create alumina particles.

All the satellites which re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere burn and create tiny alumina particles, which will float in the upper atmosphere for many years,” Takao Doi, a Japanese astronaut and aerospace engineer with Kyoto University, warned recently. “Eventually, it will affect the environment of the Earth.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I’m kind of baffled you wouldn’t read the Article and instead jump to conclusions and assume that some of the smartest people on the Planet would overlook such a huge flaw.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago

I suppose it's got a lower carbon emission than steel or aluminum even after you account for it burning up on de-orbit, considering the fuel cost for metal refining.

[–] DontAskAboutUpdog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] zaphod@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

If I'm not mistaken there are metal eating/corroding microbres that can live in vacuum.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The LignoSat probe has been built of magnolia wood, which, in experiments carried out on the International Space Station (ISS), was found to be particularly stable and resistant to cracking.

To tackle the problem, Kyoto researchers set up a project to evaluate types of wood to determine how well they could withstand the rigours of space launch and lengthy flights in orbit round the Earth.

The first tests were carried out in laboratories that recreated conditions in space, and wood samples were found to have suffered no measurable changes in mass or signs of decomposition or damage.

Murata added that a final decision had still to be made on the launch vehicle, with choices now narrowed down to a flight this summer on an Orbital Sciences Cygnus supply ship to the ISS or a similar SpaceX Dragon mission slightly later in the year.

It is estimated that more than 2,000 spacecraft are likely to be launched annually in coming years, and the aluminium that they are likely to deposit in the upper atmosphere as they burn up on re-entry could soon pose major environmental problems.

Recent research carried out by scientists at the University of British Columbia, Canada, revealed that aluminium from re-entering satellites could cause serious depletion of the ozone layer which protects the Earth from the sun’s ultraviolet radiation and could also affect the amount of sunlight that travels through the atmosphere and reaches the ground.


The original article contains 634 words, the summary contains 236 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wonder if this is good for cleanup. If we invent a method to clean space of aluminium but then have a organic component floating around too. Say a magnet, laser, sonic or whatever but it reacts differently to wood than to aluminum. Could make things more difficult as usually space has no trees and only rocks.

[–] Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago

Mmmm space wood.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So wait I'm confused is the idea that the satellite is going to biodegrade in space? Because it wont.

From the article:

“All the satellites which re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere burn and create tiny alumina particles, which will float in the upper atmosphere for many years,” Takao Doi, a Japanese astronaut and aerospace engineer with Kyoto University, warned recently. “Eventually, it will affect the environment of the Earth.”

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I'm kind of baffled you wouldn't read the Article and instead jump to conclusions and assume that some of the smartest people on the Planet would overlook such a huge flaw.