this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2892 readers
10 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

The problem with a phased approach is people are impatient and fomo-y.

The benefits of a phased approach is the people most in need can be prioritized as we build out a whole new billing and costing model for medication supply and distribution without collapsing the system we have. Apparently that's important AND not an overnight thing. Who knew?

But bully for the cons for bringing that up on the sly.

[โ€“] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah this is the stupidest way to do this.

All it does is encourage employers to drop pharmacare from their benefits, because why would you pay for something the government just said they'll pay for but only if you drop it?

And then for people who do make more than the cutoff it's a triple whammy, paying for yourself, and then paying taxes to support everyone else and the burden corporations just shed themselves of.

It's a gift for the poor and corporations, and totally fucks over the upper middle class.

The whole thing is simpler with universal coverage.