this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
608 points (99.8% liked)

Beehaw Support

2860 readers
2 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 9) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psythrichor@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty happy with this decision. I don't have time or the headspace for uncalibrated posts on otherwise interesting topics. It feels good here. Glad it's to remain that way.

[–] MayorNaise@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

I respect this decision. It couldn’t have been an easy one to make, but I appreciate the mods taking the time to explain exactly why it was made while also leaving the door open for refederating in the future.

The community that the mods are trying to build / maintain here is the reason I chose to join this instance. The mods truly seem to care about the well-being of this community and are passionate about it. I’m just glad to be apart of it and hope it continues to grow!

[–] saiyan@vlemmy.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I can honestly get into private torrent trackers faster than I can get approved to post on beehaw, and they have more a legal risk then this site will have.

I am really tired of “exclusivity”, and dealing with it in lemmy is really annoying.

can't you make instances that you all don't really like read only so users can at least read only.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kaldo@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm pretty new here so dunno how much it counts, but for what it's worth I think it's a good idea. I've recently seen quite a few users that have been posting from these instances and it seemed to me like they are just trying to instigate conflict or drama rather than build a community. The way they have write is aggressive and rude but not enough to break any specific rules, which must be hell to moderate. The mods here have been amazing so far so if this will help them, I'm all for it.

~~Besides, it shouldn't affect users too much - we can still manually go and subscribe to defederated instances and see that in the "subscribed" feed, right? This just means it's not discoverable through "All", and vice versa.~~

edit: I was wrong, it seems defederating completely stops content flow between instances, the things I've been seeing on subscribed page is old stuff from before the defederation. Still, a bit tricky but not insurmountable if it makes for a better sense of community in the end.

[–] amortized_cost@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

I've been lurking this place for quite a few days now and I realized that this place is heavily censored beyond my comfort zone. It's perfectly fine. Just not for me. Goodbye. I won't miss you just like you won't me.

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I'm kinda wondering if this will end up being the case with kbin as well? lots of redditors are coming here, albeit less than are going to lemmy I think?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] effingnerd@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

This is definitely the right move for this community.

It struck me yesterday as I was scrolling through through all communities how much crap there is and how the quality of community engagement is...lacking.

When I engage with content and community through the lens of beehaw, I want it to remain pure to that ideal. But I don't want that to always be my experience. If that means creating another account, well, that makes sense. Different accounts for different experiences.

Will it be annoying to switch between them? Slightly. But that's life at its best: slightly annoying.

[–] Griff@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

I understand and fully support this move. Though I won’t pretend to know anything about social media growth or moderating, I’ll trust that this is going to allow the community to grow into its quality <3

[–] krogers@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Given the stated goals for this community and the tools that are currently available, this seems a reasonable approach. I do hope the need ends up being only temporary, but I think it is more important to preserve the core essence of what you are trying to build than allow it to fail due to outside problems.

[–] loskristianos@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Disappointing, but understandable given the tools (or lack thereof) available for moderation at the minute. I’d like to see something like the Message Rewrite Facility system that Akkoma has, that gives you a lot more fine-grained control over what happens to incoming messages from other instances, although I’m not sure how some of that would work in this format. I’m sure something will come further down the line.

Personally I’m not bothered, I’m setting up my own single-user instance (to go with my current Akkoma one) so I can subscribe to whatever from anywhere without having to be responsible for the safety of other users. Then anything I see is my own fault.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] modulartable@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

I understand the decision fully and hope that options will improve one day to make things easier and better! I plan on keeping my account here and probably making another on a separate instance for content from those instances. I've really enjoyed Beehaw so far, the community is great--

[–] Nilesse@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

While I won't deny this is a bit disappointing because the ADHD community on lemmy.world seemed to be a decent one, I understand that this decision is you doing the best work you can with the tools you have. Let's hope that the Lemmy codebase can expand to allow for finer granularity.

[–] a_crappy_pirate@aussie.zone 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

i can see where you're coming from with that, you want to protect your userbase from malicious individuals. that's noble. it's sad to see you go, but if you must then you must.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Clbull@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Completely understand why you're doing this. I think you want this place to be more like an alternative to Tildes that doesn't descend into rampant shitposting, and that's completely understandable.

It's a good thing I made an account on lemmy.world too, so I won't fully miss out on the fediverse at large. Only reason I did was because I originally thought my app to join Beehaw was rejected (in actuality, I just didn't get the sign-up email, couldn't be arsed to check my spam folder and didn't even try to login for a month.)

[–] lavendedreams@waveform.social 7 points 2 years ago

Sounds like y'all are taking the steps needed to protect your community, even if it's a bit inconvenient.

[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago

I foresee a problem one day in the near future where users from certain instances get referred to links to content that they can't interact with, which... may ruffle a feather or two.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›