this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
608 points (99.8% liked)

Beehaw Support

2860 readers
2 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DJDarren@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Personally, I'm not entirely sure where I stand on this, so it troubles me.

On the one hand, I understand the admins' need to bring trolling and bad faith content under control, and ultimately this instance is theirs to do with as they feel necessary. I'm a mod in a couple of the communities and have yet to see anything troubling, but that's not to say that we won't get inundated with fuckery from people who don't know how to behave.

However, this makes it very difficult to see Lemmy as a useful alternative to Reddit.

I'm subscribed to a number of communities from a range of instances, some of which have just been excised completely from my feed. ~~As~~ ~~I~~ ~~understand~~ ~~it,~~ ~~over~~ ~~on~~ ~~Mastodon,~~ ~~if~~ ~~the~~ ~~admin~~ ~~of~~ ~~the~~ ~~instance~~ ~~I~~ ~~use~~ ~~chose~~ ~~to~~ ~~defederate~~ ~~from~~ ~~a~~ ~~server~~ ~~where~~ ~~some~~ ~~of~~ ~~my~~ ~~follows~~ ~~are,~~ ~~I'll~~ ~~still~~ ~~see~~ ~~those~~ ~~follows,~~ ~~but~~ ~~general~~ ~~content~~ ~~from~~ ~~the~~ ~~instance~~ ~~won't~~ ~~make~~ ~~it~~ ~~through~~ ~~the~~ ~~net.~~ ~~And~~ ~~that's~~ ~~ok.~~

Yeah, I'm wrong on that. I confused instance limitation with defederation.

There doesn't appear to be such nuance here on Lemmy; it's all or nothing. And this could lead to Beehaw becoming a limited, silo'd forum.

But ultimately, this feels mostly like it's a problem for the admins of lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works to address in being more responsible instance runners, and Beehaw is the server that put up with their shit less than the others.

So when all's said and done, I support the admins' decision, but it's not without hesitation.

[–] spicemouse@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sad to hear, especially at this time of growth. Obviously Beehaw can decide their own path, but for me the values Beehaw stands for have to go hand in hand with federation. Without federation it looses the draw for me. I'll be over on lemmy.world while this sorts itself out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thesanewriter@vlemmy.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I completely understand this decision, though I personally enjoy the freedom of being able to go to multiple instances. Hopefully, as the mod tools develop further and more limited forms of defederation are created, lemmy.world and beehaw.org may be able to come together again, at least slightly. For now though, I understand isolating your community to preserve its culture and community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spoonful@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Not a fan of this decision and will probably be parting ways with Beehaw tbh.

People have the choice to filter and handle their own timelines and there's local timeline already that can preserve the community mission. Splitting the community at this stage seems like a lazy decision - surely there has to be a better way to handle this especially with the amount of support people are throwing at the whole Lemmy thing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] frogman@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

im not adding to the discussion, i just want to give a quick opinion.

i know this isn't the ideal solution, but the admins are limited right now. there was a post from one of the admins that highlighted the importance of trust. i trust our admins to do what's best right now.

[–] Laconic@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the ideal way to interface with open registration communities would be to have a registration process where they can access beehaw from that server after they've filled out an application just as we did to be able to join here. I'm not a coder, but I think that wouldn't be too challenging a feature.

I'm not excited about losing access to a bunch of communities on the fediverse. I'm not excited about needing a 2nd account if I want to avoid this. I hope a resolution can be found to roll this back without causing the admins too much pain.

[–] realChem@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That functionality would essentially solve the problem, yeah. Another solution would be something like mastodon's ability to limit or mute other instances without totally defederating from them. Any of that would need to be done at lemmy's end of things, though: there's nothing besides just outright defederating that the beehaw admin can do until/unless the capability is implemented in lemmy itself.

(And defederation isn't permanent or anything, so once good tools like that get implemented refederation in some capacity is certainly on the table.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vortex@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This kind of sucks. But until we get something equivalent to Mastodon's limited and better moderation tools, this'll have to do. I don't envy the mods workload.

Hopefully in the future we'll be able to "re-federate".

[–] loopy@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I understand that was probably a really tough decision. Props for doing what you believe in.

I really like the environment you all have set up here and only really made a lemmy.world account so I could add a couple of communities. Would you consider adding other communities in the near future if they seem reasonable?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] satouru@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Aww, that’s a bit sad, but it’s completely understandable and probably the right decision as things stand. :(

Admins, to clarify, which “federation logic/tools” would you need to re-federate with those public/general-purpose instances? Maybe something like:

  • Beehaw users may read and write content on restricted instances,
  • Users from restricted instances cannot read or write content on Beehaw,
  • Unless the user from another instance is manually verified on Beehaw… maybe? But that would be much more complex in terms of development.

Would that be an acceptable solution? If so, I can try to get a look at Lemmy’s code and see if I can implement something like that - although no promises, as I’m currently completely unfamiliar with what lies under the hood of both Lemmy and the Fediverse.

(Not sure who to ping… @alyaza, maybe?)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dandylion@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Thank you for this in the short term. Not gonna lie, I was a little grossed out by all the furry / anime porn / gone wild stuff that was crossing my feed when I hit all. No matter how fast I blocked the communities, I couldn't get them all. I'm not a prude person at all but I also don't come here to surf random porn.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] myself33@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

i think you take a wrong decision : i appreciate beehaw, but whatever you will do, you can't control everything let people use 'block user' feature, that's the purpose of this feature, and focus only on what people report as 'bad user'. Defederate for a toxic instance as 'lemmygrad' is good, but defederate from lemmy.world makes no sense for me. i hope it's just a temporary decision

[–] s3npai@lemmy.one 9 points 2 years ago

You guys rock, and I absolutely love the heart and should you are putting into it. Thank you for your time and effort to give us all an amazing, caring environment!!!

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds as though instances need a permissions or one-way blocking system so that users can still read content while losing their posting priveledges. This would be at the risk of making the whole federation thing even more confusing, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SenorBolsa@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

This feels like the right move, at least for now. Ideally there would be a nicer more seamless way to solve the issue but that's not the situation right now.

[–] anova@seafoam.space 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@alyaza Been a hot minute since I logged into beehaw but I love the team's decisiveness on this. I'm surprised more instances didn't take this route when dealing with mastodon.social

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marco@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have nothing intelligent to add (except signaling my support) and to remark that defederation and defenestration are incredibly close words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redsky@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

It's important to start well. We're building a foundation for the future here. Positive convo's and meaningful moderation go hand in hand. I appreciate it.

[–] DarbyDear@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Count me in the "support" column. Beehaw has always been very open about what it is and isn't, and all of the people who are bringing up how freedom of speech is more important than anything can find some level of explanation in Gaywallet's post/essay "Beehaw is a community". Beehaw admins/mods don't have the tools to moderate more even-handedly, so the decision to defederate for now and re-assess when more resources are available makes perfect sense to me. I'm also in the camp of "smaller and higher quality is more important than growth at any cost." This is how you can have a community where dissenting voices are allowed, such as how I've seen opinions I personally disagree with allowed to be discussed in more detail than they probably would be elsewhere. I also saw a post by someone that I believe was from one of these instances (it was either deleted or isn't viewable due to the defederation), and it was pretty clear that they were purely operating in bad faith - essentially saying that the users here are silenced and oppressed by heavy-handed moderation. For context, they also made a post elsewhere that shared information that essentially boiled down to "North Korea actually isn't bad, it's all imperialist propaganda!"

In the end, the federated nature of Lemmy means I can just create another account elsewhere if I feel the need to interact with the defederated instances. Jerboa (my main way of using Lemmy) makes it pretty quick and easy to add multiple accounts, so it really wouldn't be much of a hassle.

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Started on lemmy.world but came here because of the flood of toxic users over there. Seems like the right call for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sucks a lot but is understandable. That said i did a quick check on the Github repo and didn't see any issue about developing this federation option. I think Lemmy needs more devs, there's more than 200 open issues at the moment, a lot for just two main devs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›