this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
608 points (99.8% liked)

Beehaw Support

2872 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 10) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ppptan@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (16 children)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] araquen@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

You do what you need to do. I expect a level of volatility for the next few months, if not more. It will all work out.

As an aside, if we want to recommend someone, who do we ping? My husband signed up yesterday, and I wanted to just confirm he is who he says he is. He’s not a displaced Redditor, but rather his jam is typically Fark, but all the things I was telling him got him interested in Beehaw.

[–] nihilx7E3@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

I just wanted to say thanks to you guys for effectively running this site! as someone who managed to see some pretty bad posts/comments from these instances before they were removed i'm fully on board with this change.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 6 points 2 years ago

This is all well and good, but in practical terms it means that if your account is not on beehaw then you should divest your involvement with beehaw communities because it is less likely to remain federated with your home instance. Which may be what the beehaw community wants, from the sound of it.

[–] mananevergone@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

Woohoo for Beehaw being the best! I love this place more already.

[–] mnglw@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Is there a place I can see what beehaw defederated from? So I can be informed of what communities I can't reach

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

It's gonna be a darn shame if users on the biggest lemmy instance won't be able to interact with beehaw or even see it. I understand your meaning, though, my most unpleasant interactions on lemmy have been with users from lemmy.world

I hope sometime in the near future, you'll be able to federate with them again.

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

Thanks. I don't see the need for federating with everything under the sun. Screw the trolls.

[–] ShinyBiscuit@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

Thanks for being welcoming, but at the same time looking out. On a different note, this post crashes Jerboa repeatedly. Had to come to my computer to read the whole thing.

[–] patchymoose@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I respect the decision for what you guys want to make Beehaw. If this decision isn't for me, is there some instance out there that federates with everything? I just want to see every post from the whole Fediverse. Is there any instance that provides that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pterodactyl@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I totally get this, the quality of experience on kbin tanked when federation was brought back up because of those instances, I might move over here yet

[–] fievel@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is something I don't understand, I'm a beehaw member and I subscribed to federated communities, including some hosted on lemmy.world instance. While you say you are defederating immediately, I still have access to those communities from beehaw. Is it an old version (like a cache) before you disconnected the things or is it not yet effective or, as a newbie lemmy user is there something I did not understood ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arkcom@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I wonder if the type of community you're trying to build wouldn't be easier with a more traditional forum software like discourse. The infrastructure and moderation tools there have had much longer to mature.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scorpiosrevenge@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago

Phew good thing I signed up with lemmy.one and not one of those. Although moving seems like it would be pretty easy at this stage in the game.

[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What I find ironic this that there has been so much encouragement to not be a lurker and comment. But, it's by logging out an lurking that you can actually see new content not available on your instance once a defed happens even if you subscribed.

[–] aski3252@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

Completely understand your decision. I think a lot of instances see the huge increase of users and become too optimistic and worry too little about moderation. Once there are actual coordinated efforts to harm, I believe all communities will have at least some ways to vet users somewhat or deal with serious consequences.. I'm not familiar with law, but I suspect that depending on the region, there could be a lot of potential legal questions when bad actors decide to post illegal shit. This is already an issue with multi-million dollar companies, federated services run by "hobbyists" will have even more trouble dealing with issues.

[–] ngmi@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Too early to take actions liek this imo. Explosive growth phases bring problems, it's not a good idea to just close your eyes and wait until it goes away.

[–] lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

is there a github issue or list that describes specifically which moderation tools would be needed to deal with the kinds of issues that are appearing?

I just created my own community for the first time and as a new moderator I'd like to start learning more about the tools that are available, and which tools some more long-time mods feel are required to adequately run a community

I know part of the reddit outrage is over mod-tools, but I was never a mod over there so I'm oblivious to the sort of tasks that are routinely required (other than banning individuals)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

@alyaza I know this move might not be received well by users across the Fediverse including some in Beehaw, but I support it. Do whatever must be done.

You are trying to curate a space for genuine, positive and meaningful interaction and it's probably a huge (and continually increasing) headache to moderate users from the Open Signup instances. It's just a handful of you spending a significant chunk of your time to achieve this vision, I know you are doing everything you can to maintain this.

Keep on keeping things to a level you and the admins can handle. I already had the heads-up you were prepared to take drastic measures to deal with the huge influx of users. Take your time, and take it easy on yourselves.

Plus thanks to federation I can just use my lemmy.ca account if I get bored of stuff here. Things have been quite lively around these parts lately and even beehaw itself has about tripled its userbase since last week so I'm not too upset by this.

[–] phrogpilot73@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

I completely understand and agree with your decision. I've subscribed to three groups on lemmy.world (Self Hosted, Home Assistant, and Travel). I don't have to get my fix, and would rather see the community built the right way. Hopefully it'll be back in the future.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›