this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
40 points (83.3% liked)

Canada

10225 readers
676 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a USA citizen, I apologize to our neighbors in the North for this bullshit getting exported across the border. I'm very sorry.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks, I appreciate it.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know, for everything that Doug Ford has done that I don't like, at least he's not Danielle Smith.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ford is a mobster, not a religious zealot.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ontario is also not Alberta: Smith's cheques are signed by the oil industry, and you have to get deep into denialism to whitewash that industry, and denialism comes with a lot of anti-intellectual and protofascist baggage.

Ford's are signed by real-estate developers and small-business douchebags (and the Venn with them and organized crime on it, well, has some overlap). They're a very different crew, and they prefer to operate in the shadows. Shouty religious zealotry results in unwanted attention, which is bad for business.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's also sneakier, and lies so well it's hard to tell the truth from fiction.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

If you come in with the baseline that none of them tell the truth, it's a lot easier to figure out who is lying.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I'll take it!

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This isn't at all evidence-based, this is just a gut reaction and being an Ontarian I hear a lot more about what happens in my province that Alberta.

I find Doug Ford much scarier than Danielle Smith because I think he's more effective at destroying this country, more people would vote for his destructive policies than hers (which are more clearly socially regressive), and I could see him being successful at the federal level.

Higgs scares me too. I'm appalled by the devolution of trans rights in AB and SK, but politicians gunning to increase corporate power, gut the public sector, and reduce labour's power really unsettles me vis-a-vis the direction we're heading in.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Higgs scares me too. I’m appalled by the devolution of trans rights in AB and SK, but politicians gunning to increase corporate power, gut the public sector, and reduce labour’s power really unsettles me vis-a-vis the direction we’re heading in.

Trust me, Smith is still taking enough time away from attacking the trans community to destroy healthcare and then sell it to her corporate friends. Same with education. As for unions, the secret wage limits Kenney imposed were just opening the door to Smith's plans.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

politicians gunning to increase corporate power, gut the public sector, and reduce labour's power

That's been the Blue playbook for decades.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

more people would vote for his destructive policies than hers

Smith won by just 1300 votes, if you look at the close ridings, and has done nothing but unpopular shit ever since - starting with an attack on CPP, which is a sacred cow to the most vote-y demographic. And it's still the first few months. So, yeah, she's not on track to re-election, to put it mildly.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...and yet, she'd get reelected today.

She would, and she will. Rachel Notley has stepped down because she knows she can't beat the UCP (or any single right-wing party), no matter what deranged psychopath is running it.

Worst of all, Poilievre is courting her hard - and has every intention of copying every one of her policies that can translate to the national arena.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know, her numbers seem to have gone slightly downwards since the election, and like I said she barely scraped in. Keep in mind this is FPTP and most of the real rednecks are stacked in the same rural ridings.

It's more like anyone's game than hopeless.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Everything you say is true, I just don't believe in my heart that she would lose.

When she got the leadership nomination, we were cheering. "The UCP just lost the electiom by electing that psycho!"

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I just got into a debate with an erstwhile Conservative who assured me that this wasn't something the political right was going to do, and that they certainly weren't going to try abortion next.

Heh.

[–] swag_money@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

we're just another state 🤦‍♂️

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ford doesn't have any special tolerance or respect for trans rights, he just knows it's a can of worms that doesn't benefit him to open.

Make no mistake - he'd kneecap a trans person at least as quickly as anyone else for stiffing him on drug payments; and probably add an extra few kicks for being a freak; but that's personal, and his business dealings (mob-backed government) aren't helped by declaring war on trans folks.

[–] Gleddified@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Anything to keep us arguing so they don't have to fix the housing crisis

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At the end of January, Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta, announced a list of policy changes targeting transgender youth in the Canadian province, including a ban on hormonal treatment, puberty blockers and gender-confirmation surgery for children 15 years old and younger.

A few days later, Doug Ford – the Conservative premier of Ontario, and one of the most influential politicians in Canada – was asked whether his government intended to follow Smith’s policies.

The two conservative leaders’ contrasting views on care for transgender youth highlight the limits of a culture war apparently imported to Canada from the United States.

Gilbert, who specializes in sex education, said Smith’s proposed changes mirror the legislative activism of conservatives in the United States and the burgeoning “parental rights movement”.

Months before Alberta waded into the issue, New Brunswick and Saskatchewan – both led by conservative premiers – announced changes to pronoun policies in schools, the latter using the notwithstanding clause of Canada’s constitution to block any legal challenges.

“The proposals in Alberta would not stand up to court challenges and so Smith would need to invoke the notwithstanding clause to suspend the fundamental rights of trans people if she wants to pass these sorts of policies,” said Gapka.


The original article contains 981 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!