this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
106 points (92.1% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 43 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'm pretty sure the Ukrainians will cease firing once the Russians leave their country and stop trying to murder them.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Here's a question nobody has been able to answer for me yet.

Why would Russia abandon a 2 year long military operation they're winning.

Literally just because a bunch of American libs said they should online?

All reports are pointing to it not being the russians that would benefit from a ceasefire.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Because no fighting was happening in Ukraine before the Russians entered the country, right? The war just fell out of a coconut tree?

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure, as long as the US permits them to accept a ceasefire.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the US going to do if Ukraine negotiates a ceasefire?

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A coup leading to a more U.S.-aligned government. The U.S. has only done that 100 times, including once in the last decade right there in Ukraine.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I'm pretty sure the Russians will cease firing once the Ukrainians stop trying to murder them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure the countdown

[–] axont@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Ukraine should leave Donbas because they're clearly not wanted there.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Aren't Ukrainian drones attacking Russian civilian targets now?

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't know why the United States would have any say in Putin pulling the Russian paramilitary out of Ukraine. Ceasefire is simple, back your ass out of Ukraine, back to 2013 borders.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

They (the US) don't, and they acknowledge that.

In the interview with fucker carlson, Putin said that Ukraine is a vassal of the US and Russia does not negotiate with Ukraine as it's useless, they want to only negotiate with the puppet master.

Hence the offer, hence the rejection. It's geopolitical theatre.

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s really bizarre because why does America have a say in Russo-Ukrainian affairs? Shouldn’t a ceasefire be determined by the two parties not currently at a ceasefire?

Somebody who is good at geopolitics explain

[–] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah why is it that also other western leaders like johnson visit ukraine and suddenly peace talks stop? https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/05/5/7344206/ Why are they encouraging a war where Ukraine would depend on even more western military and economic aid?

Somebody who navigates all this please help us understand

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Was it conditional? Or was it just a straight up offer of a temporary cease fire?

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I question why the US is doing the rejection rather than Ukraine (and similarly, why the UK rejected the last peace talks...)

[–] Skua@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

The article you posted: "The Americans refuse to talk unless the Ukrainians are also invited"

You, for some reason: "Why is America deciding for Ukraine?"

[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

There's more expiring guns to be given away yet, and more Ukrainian property to be bought at the firesale*

[–] PinkOwls@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's one of Putin's strategies: To make it look like it is a conflict between the US/NATO and Russia, not between Ukraine and Russia. He also tries to diminish Ukrainian sovereignity by making it appear as if the US is the overlord, as if Ukraine is an American puppet. It's all about making Ukraine look like it isn't its own country. That's why we get those bullshit historic lessons by that pathetic man-child.

[–] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that the history lessons from Putin are bs, but hard disagree that this isn't NATO/Russia but Ukraine/Russia. Do you know what a proxy war is?

[–] mellowheat@suppo.fi 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Vietnam War was a proxy war as well, but I'm pretty sure the (north) vietnamese still quite authentically wanted USA to gtfo.

[–] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree with what you say. OP is implying that just because "It’s one of Putin’s strategies: To make it look like it is a conflict between the US/NATO and Russia, not between Ukraine and Russia." It's not true. And I would like to challenge that.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

If there’s something I learned from libs during this war is that Russia’s no1 strategy is saying the truth of how geopolitics works. Dirty Russians… using the truth against us!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh for fucks sake, putins russia has never once 'negotiated' in good faith. they just use it to buy time to resupply and relocate. every peace deal theyve made, THEY broke. ukraine gets to decide when it's time to talk. the US cant stop them

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In bad faith to buy time, you say? That’s rich: Former German Chancellor Merkel admits the Minsk agreement was merely to buy time for Ukraine’s arms build-up. It’s almost as if every accusation is a confession.

"sources" eh? more like lies manufactured wholesale