this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
-15 points (38.1% liked)

politics

25103 readers
2497 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm more interested in the Republican Plan B when Trump is found ineligible to run.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This seems profoundly unlikely based on the SCOTUS reception to the idea.

I think our only solution to this Constitutional crisis is political or repaired by a sudden chance medical condition.

Odds are 50/50-ish on who has the medical issue though.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The article went into that as well. The Republicans will end up more committed to Trump, because their rules bind Trump's delegates to vote for him on the first ballot, no matter what. If he is still in the race, they will vote for him. And is there really any chance at all that he will withdraw, even if he gets convicted? Nothing short of death will keep him from becoming the Republican nominee.

[–] Dukeofdummies@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Honestly then Democrats win, because Trump is running. Even if he's not eligible he will whine and moan and a considerable segment will write him in or protest or not vote in protest.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, for fuck's sake...

Biden will be the nominee. Fucking get over it. The constant, desperate attempts to paint him as too old are getting downright gross. Yes, I wish we had a younger and better candidate, but it will be Biden, and nothing anyone says will change that.

Move on.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

OP is absolutely desperate for it not to be Biden and I think they hope that if they post enough articles about how Biden is unfit for office, their wish will come true.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It won’t. The only way that Biden is not the nominee is if he bows out. I wish he would, but he’s not going to

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree, but I also don't believe that if I post hard enough something will come true.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I'm resigned to the fact that because the Dems failed to produce enough actually electable candidates (or even one,)... we might wind up with a second term for Trump. its going to be too close to call.