this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024

131 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

74381 readers

2805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

131

Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumption (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumption::The U.S Energy Information Administration is now requiring large-scale cryptomining operations to report their energy consumption. Inevitably this will bring about new regulations that will restrict the energy consumption of miners in the future.

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ITT: Butthurt crypto bros

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Wow. No kidding. I lost a very close friend who got obsessed with the "get rich quick" aspect of crypto, and these losers sound just like he did. Granted, there were a multitude of other reasons I stopped talking to him, but holy fuck

[–] filister@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Let's waste 2.7% energy for some virtual asset with purely speculative value while we warm our planet past the 1.5C. All out of greed.

[+] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee -39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Fake news

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Which part?

[+] rdyoung@lemmy.world -33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Seriously. This is so much bullshit. The bigger operations are out in the north west where hydro power is abundant and cheap. I'm sure plenty of others have made moves to run on solar or wind as well. Power costs make or break profitability for a crypto mine.

Everyone downvoting this has no idea what it takes to mine crypto. If I cared enough about the peanut gallery here I would find one of my spreadsheets from years ago where I calculated the cost of mining versus buying directly. Most of the time for individuals and those wanting to hold it, buying was the best option. The only way these big operations make any money is getting kwh as cheap as possible and taking a fee from those paying them to mine for them.

Even with commercial rates, you'd have to be a trump size moron to setup shop in and around any city or town full of people.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost

[+] rdyoung@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That doesn't apply to mining crypto and the fact that you think it does tells me that you have no idea what is going on here.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The concept of opportunity cost applies to everything.

If you think it does not, then I now know the person that should be explaining crypto electric consumption to me is a person who failed to fully grasp the concept of opportunity cost.

Enlightening.. at least..

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Once again you highlight the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about.

In generalities, yes, it applies to everything. But with crypto in particular, especially POW coins, it doesn't apply the way you think it does and the fact that you think as much tells me how little you actually understand about the costs to acquire and run POW equipment as well as the risks of spending money to mine coins that end up worthless. It also highlights just how little you understand about crypto algos as a whole.

I can't really sum it up here and to explain it in a way that most of the plebs on here would understand would take several paragraphs and I'm not sure I can dumb it down enough.

If you are capable of doing the math and extrapolations I would suggest that you look into what the hardware for algos behind coins like btc, ltc dash, eth, etc cost and exactly what you would have mined in the early days and just how much you would have sold off just to pay the electricity bills.

Long story short. Buying into new crypto or mining new coins with existing hardware is taking advantage of opportunities but buying new hardware and expecting to make money off it long term on even commercial rates is going to be more profitable when you wait for the hardware and the coin to mature a bit.

For POS coins, yes, take a risk and buy in or mine other coins with existing hardware and then swap for the new one when it hits exchanges.

In closing. You clearly have no idea what the difficulty trend looked like for btc in the early days. If you did you would know that as soon as btc started taking off even the earliest miners were on a losing treadmill to keep up and keep making a profit.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

🤣

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

You are talking like if this was creating any real value. Replace "mining crypto" with "wasting" in these.

[+] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com -8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

[deleted]

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think you understand how electricity works. Like at all. Do you think things max out at using 1 kWh? Why 1kWh and not simply 1 Wh? Or why could they not use 1 MWh? Should I inform the power company that they are clearly billing me wrong since they claim I use over 8760 kWh per year?

Instead you should be surprised that they are consuming so much goddamn power for something that has little use.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can use more than one KW an hour lol

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Fuck. You can !?

I’ve been turning off my stove every time i used a hair dryer for nothing?

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

..what? Are you implying there aren't enough hours in a year to use up that much energy? That doesn't make any sense. What do you imagine is the maximum amount of energy a single person can use then?

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Someone with some brains. I think I like you.