this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
101 points (95.5% liked)

News

31486 readers
3260 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don’t get it. We found lots of planets, including super earths in goldilock zone. What makes this planet unique to deserve a separate article? The article does not explain that.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those other planets were jerks. This one's cool.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If it’s cool, it isn’t in Goldilocks zone.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It’s in Goldilocks’ cooler sister’s zone.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I beg to differ. The baby bear's porridge was too cold. I posit that the mama bear's just right porridge was cool.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

I regret that the more accurate "Mama Bear Zone" wasn't the term that became popular, instead of naming it after the character who sampled the whole range of temperatures.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Some were hot before they were cool. That should mean something.

Because it generates views

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Only 822 trillion miles away!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I volunteer to go check it out in person.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago

The best time to start that journey is 1.37 million years ago. The second best time to start is today.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I volunteer to send the world's billionaires to check it out in person.

[–] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, like the end of Don't Look Up?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I haven't seen it. I just want to send all the billionaires off into space where we never have to deal with them again. And hopefully the space ship will do about as well as that Titanic sub.

[–] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You might like it. If you don't care about spoilers...

https://youtu.be/iELeY7RNDKI

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I've heard about it, but not that detail. I'll get to it eventually.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Good luck, report back with your findings.

[–] prowess2956@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Why would you want to go live on a planet of losers?

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cool, put all the billionaires in a rocket and shoot them there.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why? Give them a new planet so can live peacefully while everybody else has to deal with what they did to this planet? Nah bro send them to Mercury and enjoy the burning entry.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Shh, at the last second we're going to change the destination coordinates to Uranus

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Why did you spoil the surpise!?

[–] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't want them close to my anus!

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Cool, how long until we can move there?

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ugh so fucking long unfortunately. I kind of doubt squishy biological humans will ever make it to another star system, we are so much closer to immortal machine minds that can make the trip much more conveniently than we are to interstellar travel.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe they'll create some humans in other star systems when they get there, as an art project or something.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah humans being built on the spot is the best shot for us existing in other systems. Maybe if we have a reallllly pro-biological human ideology by that point it'll be something like an automated probe arriving in the system, building an industrial base, and then birthing and raising a new generation of biological humans to inhabit the system.

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm in the middle of reading A City of Mars, by Kelly and Zach Weinersmith, who goes over their take on the feasibility of long term habitation off world. Short answer is, it's going to be a long time. There are a lot of questions, physically, biologically, legally, logistically, unanswered. At best, it's going to be like building a cathedral. It's a project for multiple generations.

I also like watching Issac Arthur's videos on YT, and fantasize about the future. He gives a more positive spin on stuff like that.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah thinking about the giant challenges of building a settlement on Mars really puts in perspective the much much much harder problem of sending people to another star system.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They found it in a pool of water that dries up when you try to drink it?

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I managed to grab a TESS poster at the last Goddard Space Flight Center open house. It's hanging on the wall behind me, and it's awesome to read some news about it because I got to meet some of the folks on the team.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

What if NASA just makes this stuff up to get more funding? .

NASA scientist: See that dot?

US Government: Where? There?

NASA scientist: No. The other one.

US Government: That?

NASA scientist: Yuuuup. Totally a Super-Earth.

US Government: Really?

NASA scientist: Dude. Trust me, bro.

US Government: (sighs) Make a color computer render to show the press by Thursday.

. pops champagne cork

EDIT: WOW... people seriously need the /s for this? Damn. This was complete sarcasm.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

That's a key component of the flat earth ideology. They are idiots. Don't be an idiot.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nasa is not the only space agency on earth. They communicate and verify the data.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Also the data is public. Anyone can go look at the data and if they have good enough science and math skills they can get to the same answer.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

Independent astronomers and agencies and other countries verify this stuff, so it'd be a complicated conspiracy.