this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)

UK Politics

4201 readers
92 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not sure what Sunak was thinking, but I equally find Starmers faux-outrage to be a bit distasteful considering Labours own issues with TERFS.

At the same time...just apologise mate. Doubling down isn't the play here.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think he was thinking - I think he had his scripted joke and was going to deliver it no matter what. I've noticed he has the tendency in interviews to just repeat his answers when and interviewer tries to dig into a topic, he's just not good at thinking on his feet.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Similar to when he brings out the Jeremy Corbyn digs at PMQs. That was ages ago mate, get over it.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

That was like 2 PM's ago. Back when we had a PM the country had voted for, back before we had a PM his own party had voted for.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He won’t be bullied by the powerful checks notes murdered teenager lobby

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago

The parents of murdered children have had it too good for too long.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rishi Sunak has refused to apologise to Brianna Ghey’s father and said it was “sad and wrong” to link his jibe about transgender people to the murdered teenager’s case.

Sunak has been urged to apologise after accusing the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, of having difficulty “defining a woman” at prime minister’s questions on Wednesday.

“But to use that tragedy to detract from the very separate and clear point I was making about Keir Starmer’s proven track record of multiple U-turns on major policies, because he doesn’t have a plan, I think is both sad and wrong, and it demonstrates the worst of politics.”

The former minister Jackie Doyle-Price told Times Radio that while she was an advocate of balancing transgender rights with the protection of single-sex spaces, Sunak’s comment “trivialises something that’s very important” and was “frankly very ill-judged”.

Dehenna Davison, another former minister, said on X that it was “disappointing to hear jokes being made at the trans community’s expense”, adding: “Our words in the house resonate right across our society and we all need to remember that.”

Brianna’s mother had been in Westminster during PMQs with her local MP, Charlotte Nichols, as she campaigned for mindfulness lessons to be taught in schools after her daughter’s murder.


The original article contains 507 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!