this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
185 points (90.4% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

So why is there always inflation? Maybe we're living off the future?

[–] Icalasari@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Politicians and CEOs all have the inflation fetish. Simple

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

The federal reserve giving money to banks to give out as loans is why inflation is skyrocketing

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

An inflation rate of around 2% is healthy. It forces people to invest in stuff. If there wasn’t inflation, people would just hide their cash under their mattress, no loans would be given to anyone, it would be bad.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So because of infinite growth? But we know that's not sustainable.

[–] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Infinite growth is fine when the thing growing isn't real, like money. Money is not a resource we find in reality, it's purely a human-made representation of value. It's only when it spreads to real resources does infinite growth become a problem.

[–] explodicle@local106.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No thanks. There are enough proer explanations without engaging in lolbertarian/goldbug conspiracies.

[–] explodicle@local106.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Nixon Shock isn't a conspiracy

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, but that website is still idiotic. Nixon shock isn't the sole reason either.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you have a link to share?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@local106.com -1 points 2 years ago

isn't the sole reason

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So is the meme about the U.S. switching to the USSR because the U.S. ran out of food to provide to people like what literally happened in the USSR?

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Conquest of bread predates the USSR but I suspect Kropotkin wouldn’t be a fan

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There was food stability in the USSR, just like any developing country it became more food secure as it developed. The only way the US would become less food secure if it collectivized agriculture would be if it also destroyed all of its infrastructure.

Plus, the title refers to an Anarchist title. This is a meme that aligns more with Anarchism than Marxism-Leninism.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Locking post because some conversation threads have become unproductively rude.