this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
104 points (99.1% liked)

Canada

10227 readers
379 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)

HSBC involved in financial crimes? No way! /s

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well done, Hongkong-Shanghai Banking Corporation

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why are blaming the actions of a London based multinational company on China?! Really?!

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That's... Literally their name.

It's a bank with their origins in British China, headquartered in London, with a large market in mainland China.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Bro, really. You've got to learn how to take an 'L'

We both know you edited that.

You originally wrote: Hong Kong Shanghai Bank of China Then when I called you out on it you changed it to Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation

The general history is not disputed.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Scams from China? That’s so hard to believe.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I question this article a little. The writing is over the top with some of the descriptions, mistakes like D.M/H.M, the level of personally identifiable info dispute trying to appear they are protecting folk's identities... I'm not saying it is wrong or isn't true, but it doesn't read like reputable journalism. I'd like to see it show up in at least a few other publications aside from this substack before I'm willing to accept it as is.

Also, regardless of what is happening, exfiltrating personal banking info and posting pictures of it online is gonna get some folks in deep trouble...

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

I agree with your sensible degree of caution, given the context. It’s good media literacy.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Caution is good, but I didn't get a similar feeling from the article.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago