this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
83 points (81.7% liked)

Fediverse

35867 readers
84 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] emb@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Not really federated so far, right? They talk a lot about being open, but (when) will they be really? Can I sign up for an account that intereacts with Bluesky through any other provider?

I mean, I signed up, it seems interesting enough. If nothing else it has some recognizable accounts to follow, better network effect than Mastodon.

[–] canpolat@programming.dev 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't follow it very closely, but as far as I know, they are the only one implementing the open protocol they designed (which doesn't interoperate with ActivityPub). However, there seems to be some efforts for creating a bridge: https://www.docs.bsky.app/blog/feature-bridgyfed

As you said, there are some recognizable faces and that may impact the adoption. But not being compatible with ActivityPub is a real bummer.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I was going to say, if it federates at all then a bridge should be possible

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 2 years ago

According to a random employee on hacker news, later this month they will have open federation https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39274882

As always, caveat lector.

[–] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Sounds like they are saying (later this month) you can create your own Bluesky instance…but will they ever federate outside that?

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

There is some federation, however most instances that I've seen are people's personal instances because in the past you've still needed a bluesky invite to federate with the main instance. Now that you don't need an invite anymore I'm sure that'll change and you'll see more public 3rd party instances popping up.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And once he has the numbers he will just sell it again

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably true, though the protocol is open source and can federate, so potentially has a lower blast radius next time as people can just bail to other ATProto servers.

[–] matthewmercury@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are there any other ATProto servers? Can you bail to those today?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not yet, at least not officially. I believe some people have tried out the open source code, but I'm not aware of anything active right now.

They say at the end of the month, but we all know how trustworthy those promises are.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fuck billionaires. Mastodon never had limited sign-ups because you're not a product on it.

FOSS life!

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Requires a phone number to sign up. No thanks.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just curious, why is that a deal breaker? It seems like a mild form of anti spam protection, potential 2fa backup, and a way to uniquely identify users.

[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It requires personally identifying information to login. That's a hard pass for menu people.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What about non-menu people

[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're just going to order whatever they like anyways.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Hopefully they won't have to provide a phone number to the restaurant

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's only used as a one time account verification thing, not a 2fa second factor. Still not great but at least not a security flaw.

[–] fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What I've long been curious about is whether the service provider can derive a subscriber identity using the number. I mean of course the mobile network operator knows I'm me, but does Bluesky? Or is it merely a valid mobile number to them?

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

This might have been interesting a few months ago, when they were getting the kind of free publicity that CEOs would kill for. Now that the momentum is gone, though, nobody cares. They took WAY too long to get their shit together.

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like the hype already died down quite some time ago. I know a few people who made an account, but this is the first time I heard the site mentioned this year. Same with Threads.

[–] dth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, even before this people were having a hard time to give away their unused invite codes.

[–] Xavier@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I'll skip. Just like how I skipped AOL, MySpace, LiveJournal, 4Chan, Friendster, Hi5, Orkut, Bebo, Tumblr, Facebook, Pinterest, Blogger, Google+, LinkedIn, Snapchat, Twitter, Instagram, Quora, Twitch, YouTube, Vine, Netflix, OkCupid, Tinder, Grindr, Bumble, Discord, TikTok… oh all of the Apple ecosystem, and many other I missed by being oblivious or simply never heard of…

I liked the Slashdot, Digg, Reddit and now the Lemmy format/style. Will continue to move on to whatever I find stupid simple and publicly accessible I guess. I am naturally lazy, advertisement averse and hate having to provide personal info just to use something non-governmental or non-essential.

Now, with the increasing prevalence of LLM based bots, I will probably ineluctably reduce my time spent posting anything (I certainly hope it doesn't get that bad, only time will tell) on any kind of “social media” and focus on current and new family, friends, coworkers, colleagues and acquaintances.

[–] aciDC14@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Cool story bro.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Vub@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why the fuck do they require my phone number to register? No thanks.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

To make sure you are real.

[–] ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

Sure, that’s the reason. I believe that.

[–] Vub@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are better ways to confirm someone is a human. If they would not just want to gather personal user data instead, which apparently is the case.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Like which? Overall requesting a phone number has quickly become the most reliable and simplest way to ensure someone is human. Not foolproof, but foolproof enough. Not ultra-convenient, but convenient enough. It just works, there's a reason so many do it that way. 🤷

[–] Vub@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't use any service that requires a phone number, which even does that anymore? I guess Facebook, Instagram, Twitter? That's surely just to track you. It is very easy to spoof a mobile number, the regular old confirm security code per email works just as well. Or just do email register + 2fa with an authenticator app or passkey.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The latter doesn't try to establish you're an actual person though. This is something often also done by pro video games, to make bans hit more because they bam the phone number.

And spoofing won't work as you need to be able to receive texts on that number.

That's kinda the point, in virtually all countries phone number is way more directly tied to your IRL identity as a person than an email address would be. Hence its a pretty reasonable compromise to filter out bot operators as to them, using so many phone numbers is doable but a hassle, and they just move on.

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ages ago I got a spam Gmail account with a google voice number I also use for this type spam bs!

[–] Vub@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Those aren't available to register anymore though, are they?

[–] technomad@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 years ago

That's the MSN butterfly...

#🧐

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It would be better for them to use Activity hub or at least hook into it. Leverage Mastodon/other services.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nice. Maybe finally a useable twitter alternative.

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Funny enough co-founded by Jack Dorsey

[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Yay, a "good" guy with a company will stop a bad guy with a company!

All hail Jack!

[–] vojel@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

Oh this remembered me of that I do have an account since last year and just used it to argue with some fan boys about if Bluesky is full FOSS or not (it’s not)

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I guess I can delete the invite I never used.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

joined awhile ago, I found the lack of hashtags frustrating - it limited discoverability, unlike on Mastodon where I just follow dozens of hashtags

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Wow I assumed that anyone could sign up from the beginning, but anything like Twitter couldn't interest me less so I never looked into it

[–] ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Quick, everyone go to the new hype Nazi bar! (Well, not so hype anymore)

load more comments
view more: next ›