this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
835 points (98.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

65068 readers
324 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 16 points 2 years ago

Netflix should've realised this would be the end result. The moment you needed 5-6 different streaming platforms to watch all the movies and tv shows you want, was the moment it became easier and significantly cheaper to pirate the content.

None of the big companies that decided to cash in ever stood a chance.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I find that sarcastically interesting.

I initially signed up for Netflix all those many years ago because it was finally a solution that was easier than piracy.

Didn't take long for them to completely fuck me and the service over, and I left to go back to piracy and I'll never look at Netflix again.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wouldn't mind paying for netflix if I didn't have to pay extra to not get ads, and if I didn't have to use a "smart" tv to actually get uhd, and if I trusted them with the data that they would get from that tv, and if I could share my account with my family in different cities, and if they had shows I actually wanted to watch and probably some other stuff too, but i stopped caring.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago

Cable TV 2.0: "Boohoo, pirates are eating my profits!"

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

..If you are expecting wild profits, year after year, ever increasing. Turns out that's unsustainable.

[–] AbsurdityAccelerator@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Make Netflix more convenient than my ARR setup and I'll happily come back.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

When Netflix was under $10 I stopped pirating and just watched stuff on Netflix because it was worth it for the convenience at the price point.

That is how they solve piracy. Everything they have been doing over the last couple of years is the reason for the increase in piracy.

[–] VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Piracy isn't stealing if buying isn't owning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Netflix: “Should I get short term profits by price gouging and forcing commercials on people (thereby driving people to piracy) or should I forgo year over year profit increases by continuing to provide decent tv with no commercials and no price increases and delivering consistent profits?”

Also Netflix:

[–] cozycosmic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Honest question: could some of Netflix's enshittification be because of the media industry, and not their fault? The fragmentation of streaming was the opposite of what they wanted. So maybe his point is that it's impossible to compete because the industry is so powerful and greedy that they couldn't hold onto their monopoly. Spotify has been able to hold onto theirs because record labels hold less power and don't want to get into the streaming business.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

CuriosityStream: “In light of the compelling consumer proposition, piracy services are subject to rapid global growth”

They really are just copying this statement lmao, I actually did try to find their content elsewhere since there's no way I'm paying for a streaming in USD, but couldn't, don't remember which documentary it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Jellyfin / self hosting is so great. You get the experience of a good streaming service and you can share with your friends and family, and there is no risk of a DMCA other than the initial seeding.

Unless you are friends or family with one of the Disney execs.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›