this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
288 points (97.1% liked)

politics

25640 readers
2517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“I didn’t come here,” Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina complained last week, “to have the president as a boss or a candidate as a boss. I came here to pass good, solid policy.” Tillis was referring to Republicans who were abandoning a deal on border security because they thought reaching a solution with President Joe Biden would hurt Trump’s electoral chances in the fall. It is immoral, Tillis added, to look “the other way because you think this is the linchpin for President Trump to win.”

As Bruce Willis’s fictional cop John McClane would say: Welcome to the party, pal. In theory, Republicans care deeply about the situation on the southern United States border. In reality, most of them seem to care only about whatever Trump wants at any given moment, and what Trump wants is to take refuge in the Oval Office from his multiple legal problems. Tillis’s outburst, although welcome, was a rare moment of candor from a senior Republican senator about the degree to which the party’s once and future nominee has gutted the GOP of any remaining principles.

For years, Trump has attacked and obliterated anything like virtue in the Republican Party, a process that regularly features Republicans pulling their political souls from their bodies and handing them to Trump in jars for display on his mantle at Mar-a-Lago. (Ted Cruz going from the potential conscience of the 2016 GOP convention to a Trump-praising, phone-banking flunky is only one such example.)

Non-paywall link

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Conservatives abandon decency? Isn't that like saying wolves abandon veganism? When the fuck were conservatives virtuous?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, didn't Lincoln and the rest of his Republicans enshrine slavery in the Constitution? Where before it was largely an unregulated gray area.

Don't get me wrong. It was minor progress. And fairly progressive for the time. But hardly how Lincoln is consistently whitewashed. And that is the start of the Republican party. It only went downhill quickly after that.

By the 1930s, Prescott Bush was an accessory to a fascist plot to overthrow FDR. So they were speed running the whole downhill part. Though ironically they did manage to slow walk. The fascism. Hitler got rebuked and killed for his attempt. But Republicans learned you got to go slow. Not give people too many obvious clues to rail against.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lincoln was liberal, not conservative.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Where did I say he was?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're not abandoning anything. They simply don't feel the need to hide it anymore.

They finally have the implied permission they've always craved to return to the days when white guys controlled everything, minorities (now including LGBTQ+) can't sit at the same counters in delis, and they could smack their secretaries on the ass and say "thanks, toots."

This is who they've always been.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

rich people controlled everything.

Fixed that for you. To imply that no white cultures have ever been vicimized is erasure on a colossal scale.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fixed that for you. To imply that no white cultures have ever been vicimized is erasure on a colossal scale.

I'm referring specifically to the United States in the pre-civil rights era. Not on a global scale, so simmer down with your umbrage thanks. I've got enough education that know that slavery and other forms of oppression have crossed the colour barrier. But in pre-civil rights era U.S. it was clearly WHITE people. Yes, there were poor white people who had it hard as well, but they weren't getting lynched and their towns burned to the ground ON TOP of that.

If you can point me to one American poor white person who had to go through something like the Tulsa massacre, I'll accept your rebuke. If not, kindly go away.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Irish and Italian people were brutally oppressed and segregated in the 18th and 19th centuries in the US and Canada.

Hell, there is even a famous movie about it.

Not to mention that the brutally oppressed history of the Slavic people going back over a millenia.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do I deny the Irish and Italians were treated like shit? No, of course not.

But let's not forget that an Irish Catholic won the presidency while Jim Crow laws were still largely in effect.

There is an ocean of difference between being hated by your neighbours, and having a government that literally enshrines your exclusion into law.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

Except discrimination of the Irish(at least) was enshrined in law, just not during the Jim Crow era.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Lol, okay bruh. The last decent republican was Eisenhower.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

Eisenhower, in fact, chose to run as a Republican because he felt that the party needed to find its 'maturity' and embrace progress.

Clearly, he failed at changing the prevailing winds in the party.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I strongly thought in the 90’s that Colin Powell would be the first black president. I didn’t fathom the decent into madness that the Republican Party would succumb to.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I thought Sarah Palin in 2008 was the full descent into madness and that this was rock bottom and a moment of reckoning for the GOP. Little did I know we were actually sitting at the top of the slide back then.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I remember reading that his wife was adamantly opposed to him running for Vice President. She knew what would get stirred up.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Hegar@kbin.social 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He was a staunchly pro-aristocrat war-happy troll who brought sarah palin to national prominence. He wanted to increase wealth inequality with tax cuts for the rich and slashing medicare, which would literally kill poor people. He opposed torture having been tortured himself - another conservative who can't imagine or empathize with anything that hasn't happened to them personally.

And yet, you're completely correct. He wasn't the worst republican. He wasn't even the worst repulican on his presidential ticket.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

He was a vastly different candidate in 2000. Everyone just remembers 2008 after the party had essentially broken him. If he'd gotten the nom over Bush I think things would've been much better. Still a Republican, but he wasn't afraid to do what he thought was best for the country over the party. By 2008 they'd sunk their claws in and forced him to be their candidate.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Straight line from that asshat to trump via palin. He tried. But he gave in to the party rather than following his heart. He admits to that in his memoir.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

TBH, if fascism has to rise, I'm glad it did with the most incompetent frace of a man it could have. Could you imagine if someone more intelligent or charismatic was heading this nonsense?

Of course it would be nicer if it hadn't risen at all, but here we are....

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hitler was seen as incompetent and a joke. Its not as good as you hope. Its bad and trying to make it seem not so bad is worse.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

More people need to realize this. Hitler wasn't some brilliant strategist or genius. He was a failed artist who could give a good speech. And spoke to the hatred and bigotry that many of his fellow countrymen harbored. Much of his success was blind luck. And happening to have a few good strategists around him.

The biggest difference between MAGA and early nazi is there nationality, and the particular type of human failure they worshiped.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Maybe stupidity and lack of charisma is part of the winning combination though? I often make the argument you just made, but I've been questioning it a bit lately...maybe stupid and foul is necessary to gain power in the Republican party? 🤔

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

The thing is that a more competent politician wouldn't have needed to go full fascist. Bush Jr got caught lying the country into two wars and we gave him a pass. Reagan got caught smuggling in tons of cocaine and it got shrugged off. I liken it to popping a giant zit, gallons and gallons of pus is running out, but it was always there just beneath the surface.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

They have been doing that for a while now and will continue.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Decency, morals, humanity, pretty much everything good they are now shitting on it and wiping their asses with it.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you've never seen it, watch the movie 'Network.' It's amazing how that movie went from cutting edge satire to docudrama so quickly.

Pay attention. there's a minor character, a silver haired corporate board member who is adamantly against the plans to convert the news division to entertainment. Guess where he ends up at the conclusion?

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Black Mirror has a more modern take on it, but yeah, Network was one of the canaries in the coal mine.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Yup, the Waldo moment...

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

They're either sucking up to him now to get the good position in his reich, or Trump has dirt on them and can blackmail them. Given the track record of criminal activity from GOP members, I'd say a lot of them want that dirt to stay in the ground.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The elected officials are only as good as the public who vote for them. Nice to blame the symptom.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

They worked on this for generations, dumbing down the population and getting people ready to accept Republican totalitarianism. They missed the mark with GW Bush and instead got stuck with Trump. They just didn’t think they could get away with it under Bush, there were still too many good people in the government. Now they are stuck with idiot Trump.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Remember, they are fighting for us Americans! They really care about the average American.