this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
513 points (97.1% liked)

linuxmemes

26877 readers
117 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    image description:
    using the famous inside you three are two wolves template.

    the headline says, "inside you there are two wolves"
    the text on top of black wolf reads, "tell her the importance of libre software, and how I use services", while on top of white wolf the text reads, "don't reveal too much information. she might be a CIA glowie"

    all 42 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Nobody@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    "I'd like to talk to you about some cool software, but would you mind taking these illegal drugs with me first? You know, the whole fed thing."

    [–] sethboy66@kbin.social 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    IIRC undercovers have, in the past, taken drugs to 'fit in' and keep their cover. The guidance to undercovers is probably 'try to avoid it' but the directive of 'don't get caught' and 'try not to die' probably override that.

    [–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    What if you do it with weed though? Drug tests for stuff like cocaine and meth aren't very reliable but testing positive for nonpsychoactive thc metabolites on every drug test for the next 4 months because you had to smoke a joint to "fit in" is going to have a good chance at threatening any government employee's career. They normally let people go over that in a heartbeat no matter how valuable they are. I'm having a hard time believing that there would ever be any situation where the feds wouldn't fire one of their own people over thc. Company policy usually trumps all other reasoning. Under the federal drug free workplace policy if you test positive you get fired. That's the rule.

    Them: "That's a myth, actually, they can totally do drugs undercover."

    Me: "Do you want some free acid the CIA made or not?"

    [–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago (5 children)
    [–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    CIA agents glow in the dark.

    [–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Do you have to crack them in half and shake them a bit first before they start glowing?

    [–] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

    No, they do that by themselves

    [–] vrojak@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    You can see them when you're driving.

    [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Ya just run them over, that's what ya do.

    [–] sethboy66@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Actual video of CIA agents experiencing low-light photonic emissions in the visual spectrum.

    [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 2 years ago

    Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

    video

    Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

    I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    [–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

    It's even worse when you shine a black light on them

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago

    This comment glows

    [–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Wikipedia sez

    The term was coined by computer programmer Terry A. Davis, who allegedly believed that the CIA was stalking and harassing him. "Glowie" is often used in online forums to refer to government agents, especially undercover operatives who infiltrate online far-right spaces.

    "Glow in the dark" and its derivative terms have been used to refer to various groups: newcomers that do not fit in with the culture of certain forums and are thus suspected to have bad intentions, journalists who report on extremist groups, tech companies that collect users' personal data, and others.

    [–] banazir@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

    Rest in peace Terry, you crazy diamond!

    [–] amanaftermidnight@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    My eyes sheds a little tear seeing Terryisms live on in the lingos of the tech savvies.

    [–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

    Inside of you there are two wolves.

    But the total recommended number of wolves inside a human body is zero. And they shouldn't be able to talk.

    Go see a doctor.

    [–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

    Thanks for the alt text. You don't have to write complete sentences, for example "white wolf:" is enough.

    [–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

    thank you for the suggestion.

    [–] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 2 years ago

    You have reached transcendence when you realize it's a honey pot and you go anyway.

    [–] glowie@h4x0r.host 14 points 2 years ago

    She's def a glowie

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Just what services do you use that are of interest to three letter agencies? They really aren't interested in tracking down furry-porn browsing habits through TOR and I2P

    [–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

    So every corporation on the planet is full of suspects for the crime of employing system admins then. Well, good luck to them

    [–] u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

    For me it's more like:

    • Tell other people about all these cool FOSS so people can enjoy them and ditch Big Tech stuff
    • Don't tell other people about all these cool FOSS because they might get too popular and Big Tech might notice and do whatever they can to remove competition by any means necessary.
    [–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

    The wolves inside of me are now kissing 😳

    [–] JoShmoe@ani.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Which one is going to win?

    [–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    the black one seems to be winning as I don't want another one falling victim to proprietary disservices.

    [–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

    I read your meme and comment in Dale Gribbles voice.

    [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    If your threat model involves evaluating whether someone is a glowie, ask your mental health care professional about symptoms of paranoia/schizophrenia.

    Unless distrusting strangers is the only reason you’re not in jail for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. In that case, how’s your connection speed to Lemmy via TOR (I’m actually curious!)?

    …I think you’d want to use TOR for everything if you were actually deep into black hat stuff, or is that overkill?

    Another question, how many of us have actually interacted with the CIA? Aren’t they going after like super naughty people? And Aaron Swartz, motherfucking murderers. (different feds though) RIP

    Signed,

    Glowie throwing you off the scent

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

    TOR has a bunch of backdoors for three letter agencies. You're better off not connecting to the Internet if that's the threat model, and people do have to live with such threats in some parts of the world.