this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
30 points (91.7% liked)

News

37047 readers
2624 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

When I see data like this I wanna know what the salaries/wages for those jobs were.

Because we Also lost like >20,000 $100k+ jobs

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"We lost 100k tech jobs, but they all got two janitor jobs each to cover their bills. So we've doubled the job market. Aren't we great?"

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those tech jobs shouldn't have existed to begin with. They were being paid with borrowed money when interest rates were stupid low.

I don't give a shit about the middle management that lost their jobs but the real talent could have been and probably would have been working for themselves or with smaller companies making less but they wouldn't have lost their job like they did. This isn't about Biden or really even the rates being hiked, this is about the grow or die mentality that fuels our economy and stock market.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're not wrong but those are people who are suffering right now.

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What does that have to do with what was being discussed?

I get your sarcasm but the tech jobs that were lost aren't going to be mopping floors. They will find something if they haven't already and plenty probably got a severance package plus unemployment, etc.

If it wasn't clear. I was pointing out what this is really about and it's not about Biden versus whatever monstrosity the maggats parade around. These job losses in particular are thanks to the economic engine that everyone seems to think is the only way to have a good economy. They weren't lost because Biden did anything and they would have been created under whoever was the sitting president when interest rates hit those lows.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

don't give a shit about the middle management that

Those are people who are suffering too.

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? The middle managers aren't suffering, most probably kept their jobs or got moved around elsewhere.

I feel nothing for people losing jobs that aren't actually needed in a company.

I really hope you are being sarcastic, if not it means you are one of those wastes of skin and office space that only hamper production by those they are managing. The state of management in most companies is one of the reasons I'm self employed. I don't have to have some fuckwad that failed upwards telling me to do things the most inefficient way or worse making my job hell because they have to hover and micromanage.

You aren't getting the point so peace out.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

feel nothing for people losing jobs that aren't actually needed in a company.

Because the health of the company's finances should elicit more empathy than humans losing their means of survival?

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We lost those tech jobs because they shouldn't have been jobs in the first place. Companies went on a spending bender with borrowed money at ridiculously low rates and when they couldn't keep making the payments and keep the people they hired, they had to make a choice.

Note that I am not defending the corps that pulled this shit. Our economy is based on bullshit and the grow or die mentality of most of the investment firms that are willing to fund new ideas or new takes on old ones.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I understand your point, I just think profit margins and executive compensation packages tell a different story.

Which is why to me it's weird to see a headline about how many jobs are gained, without knowing how much money those people are pulling down. Idk. I don't know much about economics.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The increase in employment was robust and broad based," said Joe Brusuelas, RSM chief economist. "Gains were clustered in the higher-paying categories."