F1 wants US $s for their stock
F1 wants US eyes on their races
F1 wants 3 US races
F1 doesn't want a 2nd US team
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
86 points (93.0% liked)
Formula 1
10323 readers
8 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
๐ F1 Calendar
๐ FIA Documents
๐ F1 Pace
2025 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 29-31 Aug |
| ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 05-07 Sep |
| ๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijan | 19-21 Sep |
| ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 03-05 Oct |
| ๐บ๐ธ United States | 17-19 Oct |
| ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 24-26 Oct |
| ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 07-09 Nov |
| ๐บ๐ธ United States | 20-22 Nov |
| ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar | 28-30 Nov |
| ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 05-07 Dec |
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโt want to become formuladank.
- No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's ludicrous.
The teams don't want to share the price pool
Great sportsmanship demonstrated by the teams!
What's the shortest start/finish straight on the calendar? The only real limit to the number of teams in my mind comes purely from how much longer the cars are that at a certain point the grid has to wrap around the final turn. I don't think we're anywhere near that on any of the current tracks, though.
The thing is, in order to gain grade 1 status a track must have capacity for 12 teams
who needs that when you can just spin up a street circuit anywhere
Oh we totally had that in Vegas last year.
Went to check and sure enough: https://youtu.be/Q6InUqrk9F4?t=20
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/Q6InUqrk9F4?t=20
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
We used to have pre-qualifying for situations like that
Is there any particular reason or regulation why the F1 races couldn't use a running start like other categories? Where everyone departs from the pits at fixed intervals and then the race starts after a 0 lap. Is the grid start from standstill mandatory?
Standing starts are almost as integral to the identity of F1 as open wheels are. Right or wrong, F1 is almost certainly never going to switch to rolling starts.
Presumably you'd get less wheel-to-wheel racing, and considering that most recent rule changes have been in pursuit of more of that, it seems unlikely they'd take a course that resulted in less.
Rolling starts are lame. I donโt know why youโd want to do that.
I don't particularly want it one way or the other. I was genuinely asking since I don't know a lot about the sport. I find it all boring and lame regardless but I'm open to learn and appreciate. But nobody seems to fucking know or care enough to answer the question. And just down votes, I suppose out of an imaginary insult or slight implied by the question.
- F1 has lost its way
- The teams are too greedy for that sponsorship money so they block competitors
- F1 is too expensive. They need to massively LOWER the budget, stop the revenue sharing and double the number of teams.
Also get rid of the stupid hybrid and go back to V8 or V10. Tone down the emphasis on aero and make cars that are raceable without all the aero tricks.
F1 is boring. I only watch old F1, pre hybrid days and nothing else.
Ah yes, teams as valuable as FIRST-Judd Racing, true legends of motorsport