this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
597 points (97.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63297 readers
37 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 98 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Don't worry, some hero without a cape will appear for you and seed that bitch! (wait, that sound better in my head).

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Once or twice I've gone and found another source for the download, copied it into my torrents folder, forced my torrent client to re-scan the file and started seeding it.

Watching a thousand other clients tick over from 99% to 'seeding' is weirdly gratifying.

[–] duplexsystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not all hero's wear capes. Also just so you know there's a script which does this automatically

[–] spikespaz@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beerclue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Phew, thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TooLazyDidntName@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Could be me seeding the entire torrent except the readme file

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

Lmfao. Hilarious.

[–] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The annoying thing about this is that automated systems (like Radarr/Sonarr) will never get notified that it's complete, then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What's even worse is when a torrent is stalled at around 94%, there's exactly one seeder with a full copy in the peer list, but he has fucked up networking rules (or an intentionally choked upload because he's a dirty leecher) so that despite having an open connection in the peer list, they never send any data...

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What do you consider choked? I know a lot of people do not have good upload speeds regardless of what the download speeds are.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Choked, as in turned to 0b/s

[–] assa123@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Hey, no need to be sarcastic! /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This seems to happen alot. I always wondered if it is really a peer or some weird spoofed peer that just tries to give you hope before crushing your dreams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i had a similar one, godawful speed (i don't remember how much, but it was measured in single or double digit kbit/s) and turned on their computer when i went to bed, and off exactly when i came back from work.

ended up leaving the computer on the whole day for a few days. this guy owes me 5 bucks.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If he's the single seed left on a torrent, chances are he's the last seed on a bunch of other torrents as well, and his bandwidth is being choked by everyone who wants his stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Want to be honest here, my real pet peeve is that it shows 100%. Ever. At all. Let alone when it hangs there... That's just insulting.

If it is 100% complete, I should not be waiting for anything. If I were ever developing an operating system I would never allow for 100% to display on a progress bar. 100% means it's done. We advance to the next screen. Do not display it. It makes no sense.

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do often desire a "click to continue" option, especially helpful for asynchronous tasks. Start a render, and when you get back it says 100% without you having to look at the output folder, for instance. I get what you mean though, it certainly should say 100% unless it's totally donezo. Probably lazy rounding errors in some cases (Microsoft products are the worst at showing accurate progress bars)

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would say a click to continue screen would count as a next screen in the context of what I'm talking about.

I guess I should have been more clear as to say, it should never say 100%, and still be in the loading loop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Im 101% done with 100% progress bars

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

maybe display it for the user for half a second. but nothing else.

my3d printer does this on long prints too, it'll say 100% for up to 10 minutes when it's a really long print. makes no goddamn sense.

probably rounding shit in the software and a lack of care on the manufacturer's side.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm just saying that in the world of zeros and ones, a one should never be a zero.

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like this saying. I'm going to steal it. It's mine now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Part of why I moved to usenet.

Everything always downloads at full speed (limited by disc write speed in my case), so if there's missing data you find out about it within a min or two instead of after 3 days of trying.

Usenet also includes parity data so you can rebuild missing data to an extent.

[–] calmluck9349 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Till you're missing that one article.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yup, point is I find out much much sooner and can move on to a new nzb. A single ~15gb nzb takes 5min max whether it succeeds or not. I'm never ever waiting on slow seeds.

Multiple providers can improve availability, but I've seen no need. Everything myself or my users have requested has been found and downloaded within 25min, including re-tries. Typically it's about 15min from user request to 'available to watch' email notification.

Worse case I can fallback to torrents, but I haven't had to yet with over 31tb out of usenet alone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If it's a video, you can probably still watch it

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's usually just an nfo or srt file that one seeder has deleted

One time I added a subtitle file to the download folder, renamed to the same as the movie file, and the download percentage jumped to completed

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I wish people would adopt torrent V2 because that one missing 500 byte file can make the video unwatchable. With V2 each file has it's own sha256 hash and can be checked and shared individually. It would also improve torrent health.

[–] droolio@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The next best alternative would be BiglyBT's Swarm Merging feature (which works similarly, and amazingly well on v1 torrents considering it only stores a precise file size instead of a hash in Vuze/Bigly's own DHT). I've been able to 'complete' numerous separate torrents where availability was <1.

BiglyBT already supports v2 but dunno if Swarm Merging works with such torrents yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yarr you need some wind in yer sails matey

[–] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

You should get your money back!

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Force Recheck.

I have a lot of these just go to 100% after checking the downloaded files.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What does the 0.1% of the file contain anyway, if it's a video and most of the data is there it might be either playable or if not it probably might be able to be repairable so it can play, albeit with minor corruption in the damaged part.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Video files can be played with as little as 5% downloaded, so long as the header and footer are complete

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is it? If it’s a video it’s probably fine.

[–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No it's not. You try wating for an hour with your dick in your hand edging while waiting to see some serious... ahem... debates over global warming.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] GregoryTheGreat@programming.dev 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Porn. He’s talking about porn.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah but that is video, if you have 99.9% of the file often times it plays just fine.

[–] blakeus12@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What, you've never edged while waiting to see a heated debate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

BitTorrent has partial seeding. So if someone extends a torrent with some files, the original one can still be used for seeding.

Another reason for the last bit being the slowest is because populars chunks are downloaded first.

load more comments
view more: next ›