this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
460 points (93.2% liked)

politics

25168 readers
2510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 141 points 2 years ago (4 children)

"Donald Trump and his far-right 'holy war' against Taylor Swift could cost him the next presidential election."

News from a completely normal and not broken at all timeline. Imagine reading that sentence to someone 10 years ago.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 71 points 2 years ago (1 children)

10 years ago was still 2 years left in the final Obama administration. Add on just a bit more to really drive those 2014 people crazy:

“After an unsuccessful violent insurrection to stay in the White House after being voted out, Donald Trump and his far-right ‘holy war’ against Taylor Swift could cost him the next presidential election.”

[–] zzzz@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We're about 80% of the way to Idiocracy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're past Idiocracy. President Camacho listened to the smartest person in the room. Trump thinks he is the smartest person in the room.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Trump knows he's not the smartest person in the room. Trump wants to claim to be the smartest person in the room, and enjoys watching nobody correct him. That makes him feel like the most powerful person in the room. He doesn't care who the smartest is, as long as he gets to claim it and all the credit for everything smarter people do near him.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ares35@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago (4 children)

who has 'pop star saves democracy' on their bingo card?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like that headline would be completely normal during the 80s satanic witch hunt.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago

I think they'd be confused about why a real estate celebrity is going after a 1 year old girl but yeah not too far off

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 121 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Watching Kimmel's monologue from yesterday-

The same people who believe Joe Biden has dementia and needs Kamala Harris to feed him butterscotch tapioca every night also believe that he has somehow planned and executed a diabolicalically brilliant scheme to fix the NFL playoffs so the biggest pop star in the world can pop up on the jumbotron during the Superbowl in between a Kia and a Tostitos commercial to hypnotize her 11-year-old fans into voting for Joe Biden.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So weak you can crush them, so strong you’re terrified.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

It's the Fascist™ way!

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 85 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You know what? It's kinda nice that it may come down to mainstream culture to bring this poison down. It just highlights how different our culture is from our politics. I'm not sure I have point.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] first_must_burn@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And the only reason Taylor Swift got involved is because the crazies started saying she was, with no evidence, until she felt pressured to speak out

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 70 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

They're not trying to win the popularity contest. They're trying to win the "do what we say or maybe one of our violent followers will try to kill you" contest. That's what Hannity means by "think twice."

They abandoned the pretense of nonviolence and freedom of speech for their enemies quite a while ago.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

do what we say or maybe one of our violent followers will try to kill you

Like this guy.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Having watched Fox News from time to time I am amazed that this kind of thing hasn't yet started happening more often.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guarantee you Taylor Swift has some of the best security in the world, so I'm guessing that doesn't worry her much.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 26 points 2 years ago (4 children)

They could still bomb one of her concerts, or drive a car into fans waiting in line, or some other type of stochastic terrorism. Like a lot terrorism, it's not necessary to do enough to actually endanger a real high percentage of people, just enough to make anyone who won't toe the line a little fearful about their safety because of it. A little bit's enough.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (7 children)

After 8 years of whatever Democrats claim they're doing, Donald Trump may have finally encountered opponents who are interested in fighting back.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I really, really want the history books to say that Taylor Swift was responsible for Trump losing by a landslide.

It's oddly fitting for this cursed timeline

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're right, it fits all too well. I'm not currently really a Taylor Swift fan but I would buy every album if she did that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago

Out of the two of these people only one is actually a billionaire :)

That’s gotta chap his orange ass

[–] Yewb@kbin.social 49 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My friends dad who had spent his entire life as a staunch republican like Reagan style came to her and said "who do you want me to vote for, you are going to be here I wont".

I hope this perspective shift happens with all boomers.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

spent his entire life as a staunch republican like Reagan style

TBF his perspective hasn't changed that much. It's his party that has abandoned him.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ray-gun was a Trump precursor. It was Bush Sr. that took a step back from the brink and went back to just being an awful jackass.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xkoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 years ago

Taylor Swiftboating.

[–] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Make America Great Again (Taylor Version)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

If Trump loses, I hope they have Taylor Swift play at Biden's Inauguration. I don't even like Taylor Swift's music, but it'd be a nice slap in the face to the GOP.

Actually, one tactic the Biden campaign could use to get out Swifties to vote for him is to pre-emptively get Taylor Swift to agree before the election to a concert at his inauguration. "Hey, if we win, guess who you can come see for free in concert?"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

After weeks of Republican media pundits and a former presidential candidate vilifying her, going as far as saying she's a Defense Department psy-op asset

Of course. Everyone is an agent of darkness. The right has this problem. They can’t say „We fight to make your lives miserable and we will fuck you and the whole nation over. It will be a complete clusterfuck”. Because that would be honest. So they have to make up enemies.

it seems all but certain Trump will jump into the fray soon after Rolling Stone reported one of his confidants predicted a "holy war" against the pop sensation.

“Holy war” sounds way cooler than what it really is. If you just could see how pathetic you really are, Donnie. And your followers are somehow even worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RedditReject@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

The difference between Swift and Trump is that Taylor understands she needs to give back to her fans, in music and performances. Trump just sees his fans as providing something for him, their money in donations and ego boosts.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

It's 2024 and Swifties are scarier than Anonymous; Maybe it's looking glass-ception and we need to go through more of them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Taylor Swift for presidentress! 😅

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmfao she's got no experience but might actually do a better job.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Couldn't be worse then Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can she and AOC tag-team it?

[–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think most would be down to watch AOC and Tay-Tay tag-team just about anything

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I have to agree. He will not.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

He can’t even win a war with a crossword puzzle.

load more comments
view more: next ›