this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Science Fiction

24 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is aimed at fans and creators of sci-fi and related media of all kinds. It includes all content related to the sci-fi genre and only content related to the sci-fi genre. The goal is to build a community for everyone who enjoys science fiction and related topics. This includes the obvious books, movies, and TV shows, but also original writing, the discussion of writing SF, futuristic art and designs, and the science and technologies that inspire the sci-fi genre. **Team Top 20**

founded 2 years ago
 

Subjects like nuclear armageddon are simply too important to be taken seriously.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Dr Strangelove could be backstory for a post-apocalyptic society.

It would work for anything from A Canticle for Leibowitz to the Fallout games.

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I agree. It's a pre-apocalyptic movie that gets as close as possible to crossing that boundary, without doing so.

Though I would argue that there's not a hard cutoff between the pre-apocalypse and post-apocalypse. There is also a period where the apocalypse is actively occurring. So there's a pretty big barrier to it becoming post-apocalyptic.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

No, because it's about how the apocalypse happens, not what people do after.

There's also nothing sci-fi about it. The Russians could have built a doomsday device, they just didn't (as far as I know).

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

It's not "post" apocalyptic, so no. I'm not sure I'd call it sci-fi either, but it's more applicable.