this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
389 points (97.6% liked)

politics

29314 readers
2090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 138 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Jesus, I get off work and suddenly there are 20 reports on comments about Abbott being in a wheelchair.

Removing ALL of them. You want to make fun of him for being a useless fuck? Go ahead. Pick on him for being emotionally and intellectually bankrupt? Not a problem.

Going after him because he can't walk is low hanging fruit. Do better.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

For the unaware: He’s in a wheelchair because a tree branch fell on him while he was jogging. He sued the homeowner where the accident occurred, won millions in the settlement, and even got the homeowner on the hook for lost future earnings. Abbott had just graduated from law school a few months prior to the accident, and argued that since he wasn’t able to work he should be compensated for his future lost earnings. So the homeowner has to pay him a wage of $14k/mo (an amount the judge decided would be fair for a lawyer to make if they were able to work full time) for the rest of his life. Abbott then used that money to kickstart his political career.

The only time it’s “acceptable” to make fun of him being in a wheelchair is when pointing out his hypocrisy, because one of his first acts as a lawmaker was to put a cap on his exact type of settlement, with an exception for himself. So nobody else can get the same kind of massive settlement he did. The dude is the very definition of “pulling up the ladder behind himself.”

[–] hips_and_nips@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Precisely. It’s textbook GOP “fuck you, I got mine” behavior and he should absolutely be shamed with it, if that degenerate had the capacity to feel shame.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

14k a month is like 14 peoples min wages. Wtf.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 years ago

Thank you. That was pretty disappointing both how readily they were coming out and how thoroughly they were being supported. Taking a hard stand to not make that the norm is good for the community.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Thank you mister janitor.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's all showboating from Abbott. Prick probably thinks he has a chance at being President one day.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

I think that they'd all rather be Sarah Palin than Donald Trump. Get famous enough that you can spend the rest of your days as a Fox/OAN talking head and 'best selling' author.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (7 children)

The Astroturfing is strong here, does anyone actually believe that liberals are suddenly, with absolutely no warning, crawling over each other to mock his disabilities instead of his decisions, despite never having done so before?

Obvious setup is obvious.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

C'mon, not every shit take on the internet is paid by Putin or whatever. If it was, I'd have enough money to do something else

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)
[–] cheesebag@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can we PLEASE, in the Trump / Brexit era, recognize how baseless accelerationism is? Have we not learned the lesson of

"Once these people do this terrible, stupid thing, they will realize how terrible & stupid it is"

-is completely false? And in fact tons of people will double down on the stupid terrible thing? They'll double down so much that they'll gladly swallow horse dewormer & bleach, and not get vaccinated, and literally die drowning in their own fluids before admitting that maybe that wasn't such a good idea?

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I live here, in the thick of it, and honestly you could probably just tell most of them succession happened and it worked and everything is fine now and they'd probably believe you, and the crazy part is, they'd never notice because they likely expect nothing to change in their completely unaffected by anything ever in their entitled as hell daily lives

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

It's possible to do illegal things.

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I don't live in Texas, can I start a petition for them to secede?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

i, for one, would love to see conservative states get spanked into submission like they did 150 years ago. they need to learn to shut their fucking mouths and do as they're told.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

You're aware hundreds of thousands were killed during the Civil War, right?

I, for one, would love to see a resolution without bloodshed.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One side of the political spectrum has proven that they are willing to kill to get what they want.

Not sure how it will turn out but there's already bloodshed.

The question is how much bloodshed are we willing to see before we do something about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I would love to see our national problems solved peacefully but the same republicans pushing for civil war in Texas are the same people who also have been obstructing Congress from doing the will of the people for the last 15 years. They're the same people who tried to overthrow the government when Trump lost to Biden.

Have you been living under a rock, or just idealistic? It might be time to get a bag ready.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If advocating against a civil war makes me idealistic, then so be it.

Anyone who thinks a civil war is necessary and appropriate is ignorant of the cost of war. They should honestly ask themselves if they would truly back up their words with actions, or do they only hold those feelings behind the safety of a screen.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd rather see them secede and watch how quickly Texas and Florida get tired of having to carry the rest of the red states without federal money from blue states. We'd be fine or perhaps better of without them, but I don't think the reverse is true.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›