this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
224 points (100.0% liked)

Memes @ Reddthat

1210 readers
1 users here now

The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.

We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They are going to need a lot more money before #nintendo destroys them

Honestly surprised it hasn't been taken down considering...

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 71 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pokémon already had animal slavery, they didn't add that part. Just the guns.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

You can slavery the humans too

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Taken down considering what?

Being derivative is not necessarily an actionable offense.

[–] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The Nintendo and TPC legal teams have been watching Palworld since it was announced. If there was anything actionable, they would have acted already.

Just look at the Pokemon mod for Palworld that was already taken down, less than 8 hours after being announced.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 19 points 2 years ago

That Link's Awakening HD fan game lasted for, like, a week, and that was barely anything beyond a direct copy. Could be there's nothing for the lawyers to litigate, or it could be they're building a broader case based on a cohesive body of evidence.

All that to say, don't mistake inaction for inability to act.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or they're trying to make as much as possible off them from a lawsuit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

That's not how it works. Copyright infringement requires the company to defend its copyright. Companies are not allowed to just leave it for a bit if they do that then it's interpreted as them having abandoned their copyright.

Anyway there's absolutely nothing actionable because you cannot copyright basic ideas. You cannot copyright the idea of made up animals that you do things with.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Not only that, but it is not like any of the Pokemon games. Some of the character models are certainly uncanny, and other than pal spheres instead of pokeballs, the two games aren't even similar.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nintendo is the most litigation heavy company in the world if they've not been taken down already then it's obviously because there is no case. The game has been in development for like 2 years now and Nintendo has had plenty of time. It's come out now, which means it's not a problem.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

There is one Pal'mon that genuinely has a model that is almost a copy of a Poke'mon.

The "hair" on Azurobe is a tweaked version of the hair on Primarina.

There are like 3 others that have features that kind of copy Poke'mon, but so weak that you can't really call it a problem.

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let's Game it Out already broke this game with an assault rifle: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jQJYHSlz4Ss

[–] reddthat@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Was it an assault rifle? Or was it glitching building stairs in a place where you get infinite XP? Either way that video is what inspired this meme (for me at least)

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I guess you could argue both. Once you have the AR you're basically unstoppable.