this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
144 points (86.4% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anon6317@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why does CNN put genocide in quotes in the article after the international court has already ruled that the actions in Gaza meet the definition?

[–] snek@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Journalistic integrity"

PS: but also what the other person said.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 17 points 2 years ago

Technically, they only ruled that genocide is plausible enough to hear the case (and that South Africa has a right to bring the case).

[–] Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Guys. Vote in your interests. Sure Biden might be a complicit war criminal but the other guy is a domestic criminal who would be an enthusiastic war criminal given half a chance.

Secure your country from the Putin's pet orangutan for another four years, then rake Biden across the coals.

If we're lucky, we won't have to deal with either of them in 2028.

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago (18 children)

So... When your choices are between two war criminals, your first thought isn't that the system needs change but that we should vote for the war criminal with a track record of war crimes?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] snek@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When will sweet death take them?

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Hopefully before it takes us

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Remember when the professionals were saying that Trump was an incompetent fascist and we should be worried about is the competent fascist that would come after him? Biden is that competent fascist. If Trump did half of what Biden did, it would be because he fucked it up half way.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Imagine thinking you'll even be able to legally protest if Trump is president.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 20 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Is this what we can expect for every criticism of the Biden administration for the next year? All you are really telling swing voters is that their opinion is irrelevant. What do you think that will do for turnout? Why do you think the administration itself isn't making use of this brilliant electoral strategy? When Trump wins, you can thank the guy in the mirror.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Trump would probably bomb the shit out of Palestine.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Then the result is the same. Thanks, Biden.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It’s already been decimated. By Joe Biden.

If you think that’s a good enough argument, you are severely mistaken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As if voting for Trump will end up better somehow. Trump would bomb Americans if they said something that hurt his feelings.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Literally no one said that.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The sign in the fucking image does.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, you're right actually. Sorry. I meant no one in the discussion thread is saying that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›