Looks good for safari, maybe a bit small for birding though
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
128 points (97.1% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
7747 readers
289 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Get a high MP camera and slap a 2x extender on that bad boy and you should be able to get some decent photos.
And still someone using this photographs bigfoot super grainy.
All you can see is the foot
ACKTCHULLY if it was 4000mm @ f/0.3 the lens would have a diameter over 12 meters. This looks to be about f/4.0
There was a Zeiss lens back in the 1980's that had a special offer. If you bought one you got a free Volkswagen Fox.
You can certainly get 4000mm optics
https://planewave.com/product/irdk24-infrared-optimized/
But telescopes have way higher focal ratios
But, for real though. Is this a because they could thing, or is there actually a use for this big of a lens? (I mean, it says Sony, so I assume it’s not telescope optics)
let's see... If I mortgage my house, sell the car, my spare kidney and possibly a leg... I might be able to afford the Lens cap.
Looking for a backpack recommendation
Recommend an elephant sized one
attaches it to an iPhone
🤣