this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
319 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

73602 readers
3014 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing Whistleblower: Production Line Has “Enormous Volume Of Defects” Bolts On MAX 9 Weren’t Installed::A reader at respected airline industry site Leeham News offered a comment that suggests they have access to Boeing’s internal quality control systems, and shares details of what they saw regarding the Boeing 737 MAX 9 flown by Alaska Airlines that had a door plug detach inflight, causing rapid decompression of the aircraft. The takeaway appears to be that outsourced plane components have so many problems when they show up at the production line that Boeing’s quality control staff can’t keep up with them all.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 63 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Bean counter who ordered cuts on QC probably failed upward

[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You'd think corporations would learn from these types of failures. But no, not as long as endless growth is the overall plan. The yes men will keep cutting corners at the expense of safety and quality.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So far they've learned the benefit far outweighs the cost

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 14 points 2 years ago

Especially if you can get a new job before something goes wrong. Get an upper management job, strip the metaphorical walls of copper to "cut costs", and use that on your CV to get a C-suite job somewhere else.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

“Our QC never finds any major issues, if we cut budget here, here and here we can increase EBIDTA, yada yada MOAR PROFITS since our processes are perfect anyway!”

  • The bean counter
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 2 years ago

For anyone interested what happened (according to some anonymous whistle-blower):

They had to remove the door plug to replace damaged pressure seal but didn't want to run QA on the plug after installing it back so they didn't mark it as 'removed' in the tracking system, they simply treated it as door that were "opened". Parts were missed when inserting the plug, QA didn't check because it wasn't in the system, plane was delivered to the client. The rest is history.

There' s a lot of backstory to it but that's the direct cause. Supposedly.

[–] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Damn. Use some punctuation. Every word capitalized doesn’t help parsing it.

Boeing Whistleblower: Production Line Has “Enormous Volume Of Defects.” Bolts On MAX 9 Weren’t Installed.

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

To be fair, the defects SHOULD be found in the production line, but not in the finished product.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In something like a commercial airliner you can't afford to just catch the mistakes. You have to prevent them.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

In a commercial production line, there are part defects, engineering defects, assembly defects, testing defects, tool defects, etc.

Tens of thousands of parts. Thousands of employees (some new hires). Hundreds of vendors.

You will never prevent all defects, but you should be able to discover them before finishing production.

A lot of these wont even be discovered until they are assembled and it fails a test or inspection point.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 5 points 2 years ago

Absolutely 0.0000000000 defects is impossible.

However, as an engineers, it's troubling to hear Boeing say things like "well we added a few more inspection points". Lack of inspection is a contributing cause but it's not the root cause.

Finding errors at the factory is great and a great way to go out of business (both due to increased cost, as well as eventual escapes)

[–] MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Yes, but you can't inspect quality into a product; you have to build it into the product.

Years ago, some American auto executives toured a Toyota factory to learn from them. After the tour, one of them said, "Those sneaky Japanese, they didn't show us their rework area." What he didn't know was that unlike American factories, there was no rework area. Everything was assembled correctly the first time, and any worker had the right to stop the assembly line at any time to fix a problem. It's far easier than finding and fixing a defect that is buried deep in a finished product.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If true, Boeing will cease to exist in a few years for the amount they are about to be sued.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Boeing is a defense contract darling, so they can never die.

Though, the commercial arm of Boeing could get broken off and sold to another airline if this gets any worse.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, the US government will protect them despite all this, I'm afraid.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“Time for a multi billion dollar defence contract” -congress.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

sadly, this is exactly what I suspect would happen.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know, I’d be perfectly fine if they nationalized the company for as long as it takes to restore a deep and unshakable sense of “you do not fuck with QA” to Boeing.

Their current board and corporate leadership should be prosecuted for criminal negligence for allowing it to get this bad after the MCAS crashes, and moreover after they publicly committed to drastically improving QA and general safety policies following those crashes.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The US government will disolve the FAA before they nationalize any industry.

I’m not talking about the whole industry. Boeing is a single company.

[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

What's his nuts saying he changed Boeing so it was run like a business instead of an engineering firm is precisely where things were guaranteed to go to shit. Wasn't a matter of if, only when.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

Time to start arresting people at the top and work your way down. Also Pete Buttigieg needs to answer why it has taken so long for the grounding of the 737 Max 9.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

People who know more than me have pointed out that the the hole in the fuselage and the plug found on the ground don't show the kind of damage you'd expect if the bolts were present and secure.

So them being absent entirely is consistent with the publicly available evidence.