this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

United Kingdom

5229 readers
246 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
tom@feddit.uk
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
24
Royal Mail could save £650m by switching service to three days a week, says Ofcom (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toda@programming.dev 82 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I hate to be a bore, and regurgitate the same "leftie" discourse that gets repeated a lot online, but:

Royal Mail would become “financially and operationally unsustainable in the long term”

This is because Royal Mail has become private and is now required to become profitable / increase it's value over time. Which is nonsense. It should be a public service funded by a mix of direct payment (e.g. stamps) and taxation.

If continuing to run six days per week, as the are currently obliged to, has become unsustainable then perhaps it is time it returns to public ownership.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Yeah nationalise it and send the executives to prison imo

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd they're going to significantly degrade the quality of their service they'll reduce their prices appropriately to match this downgrade...

....right?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"The Post Office, the same lack of quality and attention to detail but now less often."

[–] Koof_on_the_Roof@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They will be bad less often…So an improvement in quality, no?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Royal Mail could save up to £650m if it delivered letters just three days a week and £200m by stopping Saturday deliveries, the communications regulator has said.

In a much-anticipated review, Ofcom laid out a series of options for the future of the universal service obligation (USO), which requires Royal Mail to deliver nationwide, six days a week, for a fixed price.

The regulator began gathering evidence to show how the future of the service may be reformed to better suit consumers’ needs last year, amid a long-term decline in letter volumes and a surge in the number of parcels sent as online shopping has grown.

Ofcom said there was an increasing risk that Royal Mail would become “financially and operationally unsustainable in the long term”, given the cost of delivering the USO.

It has conducted consumer research and modelled Royal Mail’s finances in the review, and will seek views with a further update planned later this year.

Melanie Dawes, the chief executive of Ofcom, said: “Postal workers are part of the fabric of our society and are critical to communities up and down the country.

The original article contains 522 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Canadian here - sorry if I don't know exactly how it works on your side of the pond.. but isn't your national post serving an important competitive function, keeping other (fully private) mailing and courrier services in the pricing ballpark?

If it reduces the quality of service, it won't suddenly reduce the need to receive stuff by mail (particularly in this new Amazon world), and private companies would fill the void - at the consumer's expense, no?

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

but isn't your national post serving an important competitive function, keeping other (fully private) mailing and courrier services in the pricing ballpark?

private companies would fill the void - at the consumer's expense, no?

Royal Mail is fully private; no part of it is nationally owned.

It was sold off on the cheap a decade ago (while it was still profitable) with a major "caveat emptor" stipulation that the universal service obligation would remain as it was.

The private owners have since hived off the profitable parcel delivery arm (GLS) into a legally distinct entity, and have started whinging that the now isolated letter delivery business is unprofitable without degrading the service obligation.

It's a cynical move.