this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
77 points (88.9% liked)

World News

49828 readers
1898 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] myrdinn@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is anyone else too busy just trying to get through the day to care about shit like this? Politics, war, weather, gender arguments- who gives a fuck? I can't afford a place to live.

[–] extant@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's the idea, you're so busy dealing with the water coming into the boat you can't fix the leak.

[–] myrdinn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Yep, and there's only a tiny spec of land left and it's full of wealthy people that don't want us to reach it

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Yep, this is a feature of the system, not a bug

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I've been practicing drinking vodka if that helps

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From what we've seen of Russia's army. I think the US is ready. The only question remains, which branch of the military will achieve tactical superiority first. One could argue the Air Force because air superiority is usually one of the first things the US does, but the Navy might achieve that faster. Not to mention they could achieve water superiority even sooner by sinking the entire Russian navy.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

People thought this about the US invasion of Afghanistan, and Vietnam, and... You get the point.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

We have to realize it's not a given that we are in peace. And that's why we [NATO forces] are preparing for a conflict with Russia," Dutch Admiral Rob Bauer, the NATO military committee chief, said in Brussels ahead of the start of the alliance's largest exercise since the end of the Cold War.

Keen students of logic maybe observe the flaw in the Admirals argument : A vulnerable peace is not strengthened by preparing for war.

Carry on, Sailor.

Edit :

Oh my , what have we here :

Q. How is RFE/RL funded and managed? A. RFE/RL is funded by the U.S. Congress through the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). USAGM is independent federal government agency that oversees all U.S. civilian international media. In addition to RFE/RL, this includes Voice of America, Radio and TV Marti, Radio Free Asia, Alhurra, and Radio Sawa. In addition to providing oversight, USAGM works with RFE/RL to ensure the professional independence and integrity of its journalists.

How very odd

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Keen students of logic will notice you've refuted the argument using a dubious naked assertion.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even you must see the irony in what you’ve written

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The burden is on you to support your own assertions, there is no irony whatsoever in me pointing this out. Any keen student of logic would be familiar with this principle.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You will understand that you are not the arbiter of what is or is not “dubious” surely ? And that what you deem “dubious” is, to less contrary people, self evident ?

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Dubious means "suspect", and what makes it "suspect" is the lack of any supporting argument. As a keen student of logic, I'm sure you must be familiar with this word and concept.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Keen students of logic may observe the flaw in the poster's argument: militaries don't exist to keep the peace, they exist for the contingency in which it fails. Being prepared for war is literally their job.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Uh that’s a bit rich.

Many militaries have been used for aggressive action, they are not purely defensive.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

"If you want peace, prepare for war."

Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus, Roman general