this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
39 points (97.6% liked)

Public Health

1004 readers
9 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flooppoolf@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

These things use light to see through the skin. I think this physician should take it up with the laws of physics, unless of course, the O2 sensor said it could equally read through all skin types. But we are pretty much warned about this happening.. if someone died under your care and O2 monitoring was needed I don’t think this is the blood gas test you should have relied on…

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

unless of course, the O2 sensor said it could equally read through all skin types.

In the article, it says the company states there was no significant difference in readings between black and white skin. The physician suing believes the original study is flawed because the company's tests were only conducted on healthy people in ideal lab settings.

But we are pretty much warned about this happening..

A part of the reason why the physician is suing is because they believe there should be warnings that these may be inaccurate for black people.