this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
384 points (98.5% liked)

News

36942 readers
2518 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Defense Department will install solar panels on the Pentagon, part of the Biden administration's plan to promote clean energy and “reestablish the federal government as a sustainability leader.”

The Pentagon is one of 31 government sites that are receiving $104 million in Energy Department grants that are expected to double the amount of carbon-free electricity at federal facilities and create 27 megawatts of clean-energy capacity while leveraging more than $361 million in private investment, the Energy Department said.

...

The solar panels are among several improvements set for the Pentagon, which also will install a heat pump system and solar thermal panels to reduce reliance on natural gas and fuel oil combustion systems

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hopefully this time they’ll stay there.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was coming here to say- they'll install them just in time for Trump to take them off again.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was pleasantly surprised that Trump didn't remove the W Bush era or Obama era installed solar panels at the White House. My only explanation as to why he didn't was because he didn't know they were there.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Trump probably didn't even know they were there.

I remember when Obama removed the W era solar panels, all the republicunts went bananas, screeching, "wHaT ABout tEh ENvirONMenT?!!1??" because they were too stupid to understand that Obama was upgrading them.

In 2003, the George W. Bush administration reinstalled solar thermal heaters. These units are used to heat water for landscape maintenance personnel and for the presidential pool and spa. One hundred sixty-seven solar photovoltaic grid-tied panels were installed at the same time on the roof of the maintenance facility. The changes were not publicized, as a White House spokeswoman said the changes were an internal matter. The story was picked up by industry trade journals.

In 2010, Steven Chu, the secretary of energy under the Barack Obama administration, announced that solar panels would be reinstalled on the roof saying that "As we move towards a clean energy economy, the White House will lead by example". The panels were installed in 2013, making it the first time solar power would be used for the president's living quarters.

source

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah. Let's not tell him. He probably can't look up anymore after staring at the solar eclipse so he won't notice them.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, if a Republican wins the WH, they'll rip it right off.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

can't wait for Reagan to pull 'em off again

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Zombie Reagan would still lose to Trump in the Republican primary

[–] rabiddolphin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Zombies aren't real, it'd obviously be his ghost mad that things aren't trickling slow enough

[–] H3wastooshort@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would certianly look cooler with an all crystal-blue roof

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The blue panels are poly-crystaline which are cheaper but less efficient.

Mono-crystaline cells are more efficient but more expensive and are black or nearly black.

[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

Which, tbf, would actually look even more awesome

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

How bout some bigger tax incentives?

load more comments
view more: next ›