this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
124 points (97.7% liked)

Kentucky

132 readers
5 users here now

(For Kentucky residents archived description)

Welcome to C/Kentucky y’all this is community is for residents of The Bluegrass State officially known as the Commonwealth of Kentucky!

Rules

No hate speech,racism ETC C/Kentucky is a safe place we will not tolerate intolerance

Tag news post with a [News] tag

If you’re posting pictures you’ve taken in the commonwealth we’d love to see them but please don’t include any personal or identifying info for your own safety

Please only post memes on Friday

Please keep post on topic

Please tag any post containing NSFW content IE sensitive imagery

Kentucky is a diverse state we are not all Hillbillies who live in the mountains and we are not all city slickers living in Lexington and Louisville there will be no fighting over rual or urban lifestyles allowed

If you haven’t heard it yet listen to the Kentucky state anthem My Old Kentucky Home (not a rule we just have a underrated anthem)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Guess who wants to have sex with his first cousin

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I think this is more of post hoc law making.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Look man, I ain't saying she's hot

but I also ain't saying she's not

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Well according to ben 10 fans...

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's not just cousin-fuckin', it's a legislative priority!

[–] Wwwbdd@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you saw his cousin, you'd understand

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Care to explain? Is there any link to chase? Thanks!

[–] rifugee@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure it was a joke about his cousin being hot.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

I mean...way to own it, Nick Wilson, I guess?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Weird, but who cares?

Is it gross? To me yes. If they're consenting adults should we stop them? No, and I don't see why we should care.

[–] corus_kt@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bill also reduces the penalty for diddling relatives from ... 12 years old onwards...

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Why would you read past the headline??

[–] MD756@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do you have a moment to research the extinction of the Hapsburg family line?

In all seriousness, at face value, I agree — consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want. However, things get sticky when you introduce reproduction to the mix.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

(Can’t believe I’m saying this) then the target of the law should be reproduction with your first cousin, not intercourse with your first cousin.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

children shouldn't be punished for their parent's horrendous decisions - we've already got MTG & Boebert, haven't we suffered enough?

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

Charles Darwin was one of the first scientists to demonstrate the effects of inbreeding depression, through numerous experiments on plants. Darwin's wife, Emma, was his first cousin, and he was concerned about the impact of inbreeding on his ten children, three of whom died at age ten or younger; three others had childless long-term marriages.[14][15][16]

Wikipedia

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

If this was happening where I lived, I would care about the potential impacts on the community from the possibility of an increase in genetic disorders of children born from such a union. Including increased stress on Healthcare, increased mortality rates during childbirth, increased citizens on government assistance, etc. Not saying these things would happen, but I would care enough to look into it.

There's also the impact on reputation resulting from one of the states leaders thinking this was an important enough issue to create a bill for, and then the impact on reputation if it gets enough votes to pass. Would the opinions surrounding morality and / or reproductive rights carry less weight? Could it even sway people away from the side taken by Kentucky just because it is the side Kentucky is on?

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well keep in mind the odds of a birth defects from first cousins is the same as a women over 40 have kids at all. But i don't see applying that argument to this case.

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe I could have been more clear, but you seem to have inferred a different argument than what was intended.

The original comment was asking "who cares". My response was intended to say anybody that anybody in the jurisdiction of any bill / law should care enough to educate themselves on the potential impacts and not merely consider the surface level impacts on themselves as an individual.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Policing other people's possible genetic disorders sounds a bit like eugenics. Should we also make it illegal for autistic people to breed?

[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

So we would also conclude abortion bans are eugenics then? I mean fine be free to fuck your cousin, if we agree on the government having no place in our bedrooms. But surely sex crimes should be prosecuted then.. as this bill also wants to provide leniency to those offenses down to age 12...

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

My intent was to answer your question "who cares" question. Now it I see that you care.

People should care about laws that are and are not imposed on others, especially if they are in a position to voice support or opposition to those laws.

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

his first cousin is probably bad as fuck

[–] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Kentucky, WTF?!

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kentucky. Not big surprise.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, my bet would have been on Alabama for that, but Kentucky is fine.

They are just aligning the law with the Taliban Sharia...

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's always been legal in Bama

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In Alabama it is probably verboten to marry farther out than first cousin...

[–] menthol@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

It's still incest, it's just wouldn't be a crime anymore. Which honestly isn't a big deal. It's not a crime in most states and marriage is legal in some.

[–] Dio@lemy.lol 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Says a lot about Kentucky.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Says a lot about Republicans

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

These knuckle-draggers are a grotesque caricature of themselves, aren't they?

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Believe it or not cousin marriages are not a big deal in most countries/cultures around the world.

[–] rifugee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You say that, but it's still really rare in most countries with only about 10% in the entire world. It seems that Arab countries are typically the exception and are responsible for most of that 10%. There is probably a lot of cultural nuance there that I'm missing, but the link below has a world map that really illustrates that it occurs mostly in the Middle East.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I did some searching and you're right that it is practiced in high amounts in the middle east however you also find the same in North Africa and parts of Asia (specifically the Indian subcontinent, parts of India and southeast Asia). You also see its practiced in smaller amounts around the world. Including Europe and South America as well some countries to a lesser extent in North America. I'll provide one source below but you can search for more.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0906079106

It would be interesting to see cultural attitudes towards it around the world though.

[–] Modva@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Gotta make your voting base happy right?

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's his ~~grimace~~ smile. That damn smile.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Guess Kentucky wants to be like those other backassward, conservative states like California, Colorado, Mass., Vermont...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage_law_in_the_United_States