And of course they won't compete over which service provides the better app\features\catalogue but will try the same exclusivity game the video streaming platforms started... No thanks!
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
649 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
83330 readers
3311 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I think i'm done with Ubisoft games.
Ubisoft exec is a cunt says me.
Hey now, that's they're prerogative -- just like it's my prerogative to never give them a cent of money again.
WE.DON'T.TRUST.YOU.
Haha
People don’t have a problem with subscriptions, they have a problem with companies like Ubisoft charging ridiculous sums to play low quality games.
Subscriptions would take off just fine if they were reasonable and fair, and not trying to exploit their customers.
If the way things are going is no one owns anything they buy, then the incentive to buy things drops significantly.
This is why digital media corporations make up convoluted agreements but they don't ever change the little button saying "Buy". If more people realized they are not actually purchasing and getting to own it, they wouldn't spend their money.
But it's even more revolting that the law and governments validate this obvious false advertising.
Yeah. No.