this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
496 points (99.0% liked)

News

31513 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quams69@lemmy.world 93 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Decriminalize drugs and defund the DEA 👍

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Abolish the DEA.

Deschedule cannabis & mushrooms.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

DEA: Ok, it's reclassified.

Indiana: Cool. We'll make it 5 years in prison for smoking a joint.

I hate this state.

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The states surrounding Indiana:

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I go to Illinois to get weed. Most of the cars in the parking lots are from Indiana. I wish I was closer to Michigan. Their weed is super cheap and they don't have a limit for out-of-state purchase quantities like Illinois.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wisconsin is gonna be the last state to legalize because we're the Alabama of the fucking north. Your 5th DUI probably has lesser consequences than getting caught holding here.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You're the Alabama of the north? Have you ever heard the Hoosier accent? And both Dan Quayle and Mike Pence come from Indiana. Also, we once tried to legislate pi. And not to the correct value of pi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Lol fair points, tho we do have quite an accent up here dontchyaknow? But I guess you have Gary, IN too and all we have is a bunch of serial killers.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wisconsin is a purple state that's gerrymandered to hell. Zero movement on any progressive agenda for over a decade. The progressives here have gotten dejected and tend to overexagerate the problem.

Not that it's all great. It's just not "Wississippi".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Yall might have something akin to fair elections this year. Maybe.

Your purple state may actually be purple soon.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It may be finally happening!

The whole scheduling system is ridiculous, Schedule 1 is for drugs with no medicinal usage and high addiction potential, which isn't true for a lot of them. LSD has therapeutic uses (I've used it myself) and Heroin, while addictive, definitely has medicinal usage as a strong pain killer. IIRC Cocaine is Schedule 2.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“It may finally be happening!”

I’ve heard that every election year since 2008, so I won’t expect to see it until several birthdays from now

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

In how many of those election years had the DHHS finally asked the DEA to reclassify...?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

I've noticed this vein of irrational cynicism before. Bad things happen, and therefore bad things will keep happening. I told people for years that it was already too late for Disney to extend copyright yet again; it takes too long to get anything through Congress. This Congress can barely elect a Speaker, but people were still arguing there'd be a last minute extension in the final weeks of 2023.

Point is, cynicism shouldn't replace clear thinking.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That’s valid, I just don’t know any world other than one manipulated for political gain or profit so I’m solidly in the ‘that would be amazing but I doubt it’ camp. I’d love to be wrong though.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Alcohol is unscheduled.

Cannabis is schedule 1.

These should be reversed to reflect the actual truth of things.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ethanol does have medical uses. It's the only way to stop poisonings from things like antifreeze, methanol, to name a few

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Serious question- with all the alternatives available today, does heroin still have medical uses?

I'm 100% against the moronic drug war, so this is a tangent from the point, I'm just curious.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's really bizarre the cops and bureaucrats apparently get to decide law to this extent.

[–] Space_Racer@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It has some trade-offs, the same rules allow the DEA and ATF to make rules but also allows things like the EPA to function. It really is a double edged sword.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Your comparison is EPA, an agency of environmental subject matter experts, so for drugs, which is a health issue, it should be a health agency. DEA is law enforcement. It’s letting cops decide policy when it should be an agency of subject matter experts writing evidenced-based policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Hey if this happens does anyone know how this will affect drug testing for work? Employers are private entities obviously but a lot only drug test due to federal regulation or contract compliance.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I assume that companies would still drug test for weed. It's still a controlled substance with reclassification. They may be less likely to do so, but this wouldn't stop it from occurring.

This is why it's also important to ensure doctors can prescribed weed as a medicine. It forces companies to accept weed as a medical accommodation for most positions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Oh wow, I guess William Randolph Hearst's ghost must have finally run out of bribe money.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I expect reclassification to happen just before the election.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can the DEA even reclassify drugs? All the DEA could do, in theory, is decriminalise and not prosecute - which they're kind of doing already.

It's up to Congress to write laws. Maybe the FDA, in this case.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The FDA and HHS have already made their recommendations to reschedule. Now the DEA gets to weigh in, then there’s a period for public comment. ~~After that, IIRC, the FDA makes a final decision~~. The current recommendation is to Schedule III from Schedule I.

but that’s just for rescheduling on a federal level.

edit: correction-- it's the DEA who makes the ultimate decision.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately the DEA is the agency that makes the final decision. I have less faith in them to do the right thing on this than the FDA. Though the new head Biden appointed specifically called for a review of the scheduling, which could be a signal the DEA is receptive to dropping it. Schedule I for marijuana is a joke. I mean, you could make an argument caffeine is more dangerous. Even just lowering it to another level could make a big difference in the states it's legal.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately the DEA is the agency that makes the final decision.

ok, i just looked into this, and you're correct. my mistake.

Regarding their stance... i think this could go either way, and it's most likely to be a bit of a compromise, leaning into the FDA and HHS recommendation, as, historically, they've kid of ridden the fence on the issue, often giving a token, "we enforce the law," type of answer when questioned about their stance on the subject.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks, that's a good overview.

Schedule III is still too harsh, imo, though.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

agreed. Schedule IV or descheduling altogether would be most fitting. The fact that it's a legitimate medication for many conditions and is still the subject of a great deal of research muddies the waters a bit, however.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Criminalization is a multi-million dollar industry and greed is more powerful than our laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›