this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

8038 readers
13 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
36
The Future Of E-Commerce Is A Product Whose Name Is A Boilerplate AI-Generated Apology (defector.com)
submitted 2 years ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Everything I've seen about hyper-specific-specialty-data-trained, limited purpose AI - particularly for medical screenings - looks promising. The idea of a FOSS AI trained locally on my own collection of documents is intriguing, but I have a hard time believing that it will be useful beyond asking it to pull up any notes relevant to keywords of any given project I'm working on.

Conversely, nearly everything I've seen about general AI/LLMs, including my own (limited) experiences, provides little reason to believe the hype espoused by the folks promoting them.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Interacting with ChatGPT (or any LLM chatbot) without a goal is akin to buying a tool you have no projects for. And just as a hammer can't provide plans for a grotto, chatbots can't really talk me into there being a reason to chat.

I'd also be curious to train a local model on my past work, but it feels like it might keep my attention for a bit and then I'd run out of transformative ideas. At this point, I know this is the inescapable future, but I'm swinging wildly between thinking we're going to find huge advantages and, well, apologist item descriptions.

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

My interactions with it were done to get a higher level of polish on some business related spreadsheets I was working on. I can manage certain tasks, but I don't use those skills often enough to warrant scaling my knowledge and practice to that level. A buddy recommended using one to give me the necessary formulas, so I tried it out.

Not one suggestion from the bot worked, and as it apologized and offered other non solutions I noticed recurrences of previous answers and a degradation of the quality substantial enough for a relative novice like myself to spot the issues before implementation. Perhaps it will advance past this point, but I'm unsure that the people in charge of them are really the folks needed to actually hit that target.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 2 years ago

welll, actually, llms are great at the exact things you just described... logic tree searches.. it just takes incredible computation and training at the moment.

if you filter your expectations to that limited scope, current 'ai' makes sense

but yeah, theres a ton of marketing pretending this is general ai, and its not even close.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

As much as that writing style is rather unique and interesting, it is dreadfully difficult to follow. There's a verbosity to it that would make me think the person who wrote it sat in front of a thesaurus looking for the exact word to replace what they originally wrote about fifteen times per sentence if I didn't already know eccentric people like this who exist in real life and pride themselves in their ability to use the absolute 'best' word to represent their thoughts at any one moment, ignoring the fact that many people will not be able to follow for lack of ever hearing, let alone understanding what the word means. With that being said, I did very much enjoy the imagery the writer was able to conjure on the subject of enshittification and the general state of affairs of the average tech bro.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

As much as that writing style is rather unique and interesting, it is dreadfully difficult to follow.

that's the Defector special

[–] rwhitisissle@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Unique and interesting? I get budget Hunter S. Thompson vibes.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

I settled in for "oh, it's this kind of pretentious writing" from the lede and was not disappointed. But then, I can end up there in my own writing sometimes if I'm really piqued about the topic.

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

And that's why it takes me five times longer to edit any of my comments lengthier than some snarky quip than it does to type them out.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

This is our real future, not AI suddenly fixing climate change and allowing us all to live meaningful lives in a Star Trek-like utopia. It's this.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Now I'm curious what the prompt was