this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

British Columbia

1830 readers
59 users here now

!britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cue the political right absolutely refusing to believe that this evidence even exists, due to what it means.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think the political right really cares. They don't particularly think addicts' lives matter.

The problem with studies like this one is the "...and then?" factor. A lot of voters will see this and think "Ok, so why do I care about reducing overdoses and deaths?". You might think I'm kidding, but I'm not: a lot of advocates on the left talk a lot about saving addicts' lives, but the political right doesn't care: they care about property, and if an addict dies, that's one less person who might steal their stuff.

We're shouting past each other on this issue: if you want to convert the right, you need to explain why this will prevent people from stealing their Amazon packages or breaking into their business in the middle of the night. On the same side, the right needs to understand that the left doesn't really care about property loss.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ok but you’re just feeding their addiction.

How is prescribing heroin to a heroin addict a fix for anything?

What they need is recovery, not more heroin.

I’m all for treating addicts and reducing ODs, but this isn’t how you do it.

[–] TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

If they're dead, they can't recover. Yes, fixing people is better than just holding them together, but holding them together buys more time for permanent solutions.