this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
343 points (97.0% liked)

politics

25243 readers
1819 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 167 points 2 years ago (6 children)
[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

MAGA Turns on Speaker Mike's Johnson.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

If so then Mike's son will have a really awkward conversation him.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Not as much as his sons browser history

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 101 points 2 years ago (5 children)

These people are unfit to govern.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago

Good thing that isn't their goal then.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Look, if punching any progress on its face, fixating on genitalia, pissing on your own constituents, punishing the disenfranchised for being disenfranchised, and alternately praising and then eating your collaborators doesn't demonstrate ones ability to "govern," then I don't know what does. You talking to me that way sounds an awful lot like an insurrection.

[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The problem with this comment is some people could say this word for word with zero irony lol

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’d just like to say your username is fantastic and i wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

You can catch it anywhere downwind

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That was never their goal. Their only goal was to destroy democracy, and they’re doing a pretty good job of that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah, we’re totally aware.

We just need to convince the 30% of American voters who have been hoodwinked by their highly effective media machine. That’s not been going well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 92 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Jake Sherman: “The House is essentially frozen again. The GOP leadership cannot bring up any bills that are not already noticed on the suspension calendar and conservatives just killed leadership’s ability to bring up any bills under a rule.“

The Clownshow is back.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 36 points 2 years ago

It never left honk honk

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Step right up, step right up!

You, lad, how'd you like to be speaker of the house? Or you young lady?

Don't be shy, step right up to the gavel! All you need to do is put on this speaker wig, with these oversized speaker shoes! And just this little red speaker nose! And of course make that face white!

Who's it gonna be, step right up!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 83 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Watching the party call MAGA Mike Johnson – the guy who they hand chose because he was as MAGA as they come – call him a RINO because he couldn’t unite their basket of rabid weasels is just

[–] mastefetri 60 points 2 years ago

They want a government shut down because they think it will damage Biden. They want chaos because it lets them spread conspiracies and lies. This guy doing the bare minimum to actually do his job is a betrayal to them.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

The hydra feeds upon its many heads, hurting itself in the confusion but somehow does not die

Can the Republicans just have their party schism already? The MAGA crowd took over the RNC leadership years ago, just admit it and make a new party - or better yet clean house and oust them from your ranks.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because anyone thinking of leaving the RNC understands how the game is rigged for them and the DNC, and any new party has pretty much no chance. And they also know that if they kicked the crazies out (if they even could), the only thing left of the party would be a husk. The crazy base is their power source right now.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Agreed that the entrenched duopoly is no accident, but we also don’t have a Federalist party anymore either. The popular support eroded beneath them due to poor policy choices/outcomes, and that faction was politically homeless for years, and decades before they formed a new and coherent party structure with longevity. Which itself was enabled by the patronage and spoils that soured voters on the Jeffersonian-Democrats.

Adapt or die, it’s no different in biology or politics

[–] ech@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be clear, I'm not saying it can't happen (and it seems like it will eventually), but nobody in either half is surviving that split, and they know it. They're stuck with each other as they careen off this cliff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I suspect that this is still the future, but it's hard to know when it will actually happen. They've gone extreme enough that a lot of people are looking for the next conservative party.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Libertarian Party has about 700,000 members and is on the ballot in all 50 states. I've been imagining a hostile takeover for some time.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That would be hilarious. If there's one thing most Americans seem to be able to agree on, it's that libertarians aren't worth voting for.

[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most Americans have voted for a democrat since 2004. So that's probably true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Right wing groups have subsidized and aided the Libertarians and Green Party for years. They know that GOP voters will stick with the Party, and that Left folks can be persuaded to try something new.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've always thought a Libertarian is just a Republican trying to sleep with a Democrat - or vice versa.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 years ago

Man I hope they vacate him, too. Only need a few more Republican resignations and the Democrats can take over this year...

[–] tacomama@leminal.space 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

To me he always looks like one of those old, colorized photos, or maybe a ventriloquist dummy. Maybe it’s the rosy cheeks, I dunno.

[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Holy shit, I completely see the ventriloquist dummy resemblance, that is haunting

[–] quotheraven404@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

He does have pretty flawless porcelain skin. 🤔

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Might be the hair, older style.

The kind that grew up on mayo on white bread sandwiches.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (7 children)

The anonymous social media MAGA account @catturd2, which has more than 2 million followers, criticized funding for Ukraine included in the deal.

"Blah Blah Blah Blah—you just gave 62 Billion to Ukraine. You don't give AF about our border," they wrote.

These people are the most miserable excuses for humans imaginable. Seriously, why are they so batshit insane? Is it just right-wing media, or are we looking at some kind of nanoplastic syndrome that affects the red states disproportionately?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's specifically BECAUSE they are miserable but unwilling to look at themselves or their own lives. Rather, they project outward and search for the "real" cause of their problems, who they then hope to persecute.

This is the same for all extreme groups: incels, sov cits, tankies, PETA, and, yes, GOP/Evangelical types.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

catturd2

Cat. Turd. 2.

We are truly living in the dumbest timeline.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Perfect headline, no need to change.

[–] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

he shares it with his son

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wow, how unexpected. Never saw this coming...

[–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

"Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!"

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"What are these leopards doing to our faces???"

- ~~Diseased morons~~ Conservatives

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

No. Not at all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Machinist3359@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

Broken democratic mechanisms and a split conservative party? Surely this doesn't proceed a fascist dictatorship...right?....RIGHT?!

[–] crypticthree@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Let. Them. Fight.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is what MAGA wants as leadership? Laughable and pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yasser, let the darkness consume y'all

load more comments
view more: next ›