this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
59 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
4345 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California wants to reduce traffic. The Newsom administration thinks AI can help::Caltrans says AI can help generate recommendations so workers can take steps to improve the flow of traffic and potentially prevent accidents on the road.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, I've been working on a new AI recently. I can sell it to California for pretty cheap.

#/bin/bash

echo "install more railroads"

exit 0
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Dalraz@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

You can bet your caboose it will be.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

A: "Gee, I wonder what we could do "

B: "Make the streets bike and pedestrian friendly!"

A: "We really need a high tech solution."

B: "Bring back public transport!"

A: "If there was someone to show us the way..."

B: "Reform building regulations!"

A: "Oh, I know! Let's use AI!"

B: 🤦

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Bad traffic is just a consequence of how cities are being built. People might point to car-centric designs, lack of quality public transport, and other problems that only look at the transportation PoV, but a "real" solution needs to change the urban layout to favor short trips and reduce distances.

Cities need regulations that encourage higher autonomy of neighborhoods to reduce this over-reliance on transportation - regardless whether it's public or private. Policies such as drastically reducing parking spot requirements (parking lots that remain mostly empty and make a terrible use of the horizontal space), enforcing sidewalks and encouraging pedestrian-first layouts, and reforming zoning policies that force everything to be far apart by design.

We can't expect to have a decent amount of traffic in large urban centers if most need to get across the city to get to work, or drive 10 miles for a grocery trip. This American/suburban lifestyle needs a reform.

[–] ghostface@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It all depends on the approach, Let AI control everything. I will pass Tie AI into the lights, cameras to better keep up with traffic patterns. I could see that as possible win

AI isnt the devil, but it doesn't solve everything.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I'm sure it will HELP traffic, but the problem is that our public transit SUCKS and is fucking DISGUSTING. I take BART about once a year just to see if it's gotten better and have regretted it immensely ever since about a year before the pandemic.

The traffic problem CANNOT be solved without investing a fuck-ton of money into our public transit. Stop trying to be a cheap fuck, Newsom. Yes, it's going to be hard, but it's literally your only option.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Want to reduce traffic? Ooohhh, ai!

Hoe about just redesigning your cities to become walkable safely, centered ablriund humans instead of cars?

Look at the Netherlands, follow the example, 50 years later traffic inside cities will be a fucking breeze, but you probably won't even want to have a car anymore

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

50 years later traffic inside cities will be a fucking breeze, but you probably won't even want to have a car anymore

Fossil fuel and big car lobbies say no

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

spoilerthis is going to be a spicy comment section

[–] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If idiots would stop camping out in the left lane that’d be a start. Need to actually ticket for that like some other countries do.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Traffic managers hate this one weird trick.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

AI could totally help here… seriously, once everyone gets laid off because corporations think AI is going to replace us all, there won’t be rush hour anymore!

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl -1 points 2 years ago

How does ChatGPT answers some of the toughest questions in traffic issues:

Reducing traffic in Los Angeles would require a multi-faceted approach that addresses both supply and demand factors. Some solutions include:

  1. Improving public transportation: Expand and upgrade the subway, bus, and light rail systems to provide more convenient and reliable alternatives to driving.
  2. Encouraging carpooling: Implement incentives for carpooling such as HOV lanes, discounted tolls, and priority parking.
  3. Implementing congestion pricing: Charge drivers for using congested roads during peak hours to reduce demand for travel during these times.
  4. Improving road networks: Invest in road infrastructure such as widening freeways, improving intersections, and adding toll lanes to increase capacity and reduce bottlenecks.
  5. Promoting active transportation: Encourage walking, biking, and scootering by building more bike lanes and sidewalks and creating bike-share programs.
  6. Encouraging telecommuting: Encourage employers to offer more flexible work arrangements such as telecommuting and flexible hours, reducing the need for commuting during peak hours.
  7. Land use planning: Encourage more compact, mixed-use development patterns that reduce the need for long commutes and car trips.
[–] eksb@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Men will literally let an AI kill thousands of drivers a year instead of ~~going to therapy~~ building high-speed rail.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

almost like it's cheaper and faster to implement sensors and deploy some machine learning models on existing infrastructure than build high speed rails that won't solve the last mile problems.