this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
70 points (97.3% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

11397 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After a flawless launch to orbit, the privately built robotic Peregrine lander is unlikely to reach the lunar surface because of a failure in its propulsion system.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would totally believe that the company that sold slots on a lunar lander to a ritzy funeral service, would cut corners on engineering

[–] oKtosiTe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

But now how are they going to recover the bitcoin wallet they sent along?

What a pathetic species we are.

[–] Meuzzin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Was Boeing involved in the assembly of this craft? Just wondering...

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Going into space is hard, going to the moon is even harder!

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Mind boggling that we launched a rocket with a payload without testing it at least once.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

Where does it say it was untested?

[–] 8dotpi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

It's not so weird, and if someone wants to take the extra risk with their own payload (and get a discount on the launch, i imagine) i see no problems with it.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shit happens. The editorialized title is unnecessary.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

To be clear, that was the original title. I did not editorialize it; they changed it after I posted. It's now "American Company’s Spacecraft Malfunctions on Its Way to the Moon", but was "Moon Lander Malfunctions After Launch, Raising Questions for NASA". I've updated the title.