this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
280 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

73698 readers
3219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US pay-TV subscriber base eroding at record pace::undefined

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 104 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's been over 20 years since I last paid for cable TV. I'm frankly shocked it's made it this long, but I guess they can milk the boomers for another decade or two. Certainly seems to be working for the GOP anyway.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My mom loves TV and for some reason really enjoys commercials. I can't explain it. There must be some inaudible frequency in commercials that's repuslive to me, but appetitive to her.

[–] ElJefe@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I had a good friend that loved infomercials. He’d stay up to watch the late night ones - the good ones. And he’d gleefully say that if he had a credit card and disposable income, he’d buy the garbage that they sold. Never understood that… hope you’re doing good Rojo!

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 101 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have they tried reducing their price or increasing the quality of their product?

No?

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

You gotta help us, doc. We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas.

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's alright. They're fucking over internet subscribers just as if we still had a cable TV package.

[–] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The day they try to bandwidth cap or piecemeal my internet service, I am becoming a Japanese terrorist

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

Does that mean you're Japanese, or that you're going to become Japanese?

[–] figjam@midwest.social 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

On a lark I hooked up an antenna to see what was on broadcast TV. There were like 5 pbs channels and a dedicated weather channel. For being free it was pretty good.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

PBS is actually better than ever and I prefer it over most of what gets shoved in my face on my PC.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

7 bucks a month for "passport" access, so PBS's streaming platform. It's damn good. NOVA episodes all over the place, news, new shows, etc. I gotta up my contribution.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

PBS kids is awesome. Their shows are well made and educational and available for free on their app!

[–] Roldyclark@literature.cafe 5 points 2 years ago

I love my antenna. I get like 20 channels. Local news, pbs, and old cartoons and sitcoms.

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Coming up to 16 years since I cut the cord and hardly anyone I know that is younger has cable. It's internet and then streaming.

My father when he passed in 2013 was paying $160/mth for old HD cable for his old 35" RCA tube set before I bought him a LCD TV that required a upgrade to modern HD channels. He didn't have internet with that either. So while they were scamming him for this old 480p HD packages he wasn't alone I'm sure.

I will say at new year's I was at someone's place that only had internet and for the group of us he brought out a HD Amazon antenna to watch the ball drop at midnight on local broadcast TV.

The amount of commercials was jarring. I'm not looking forward to when they bring those to streaming services that are currently hemorrhaging billions.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I watched Fargo last week via broadcast. 5 min to 5 min of commercial time. It's insane.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would watch about 16 minutes before giving up.

In the old days flow TV was max 25-30% ads, how can people live with 50% ads? At that rate it will be "Find the content" so in a few years with 90% ads watching a 45 minute show would take 7.5 hours.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Remember when broadcast TV showed commercials on the 15 minute mark, 2-3 at a time for 30 minutes each, maybe more between shows? Commercials seemed like a reasonable tradeoff, plus were predictable so you could fit it in with other things. They dug their own grave, making commercials more intrusive, harder to skip, more frequent. …. Pepperidge Farms remembers

[–] sronweb@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The problem is that OTT services are going to the adv model too. They expect that we pay a minimum subscription cost and watch advertising.....this is crazy

[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd rather do anything else.

[–] Ferris 1 points 2 years ago

I'd rather pry my eyes out with crayons

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd subscribe if there were anything worth watching. Occupational reality shows on every channel. Streaming has gotten so bad lately that I don't think we're going to have a culture in the future just people setting themselves on fire for TikTok clout

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would I pay $120-140 for cable every month and be forced to watch tons of ads when. I can pay <$20 for Hulu or NFLX a month and watch none?

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Give it time, forced advertising is inevitable.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Because of every asshole I've seen say things like "it's only a couple ads, I don't mind that. Get over yourself."

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Why is cable TV service, and TV streaming different? Can't the cable service providers just be streaming TV providers? And compete globally?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The distinction does seem a bit arbitrary, but I think it's the difference between being able to pick what you watch on demand, and having a lot of channels that are just playing whatever.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Actually Disney’s CEO touched about that during that last town hall. They release the shows both on traditional TV and streaming. They realized that the demographics using either platforms don’t overlap so they decided to continue with a parallel release separately to increase their reach. (I was a camera operator filming the event, I’m not a Disney employee, nor do I support any of their opinions)

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

They mostly are, or owned by the same companies. The consumer cable companies also deliver Internet access for streaming so they're still getting paid.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because content owners don't need cable providers to stream over the internet.

HBO doesn't need Comcast for streaming, they can (and do) stream themselves with HBO Go.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

That’s the main issue here. There used to be a law that studios were not allowed to own movie theaters and so they had to open their movies to be purchased or leased by other distributors. Now, that law is gone and this is why we’re screwed.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Aggravationstation@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

But not as much as the high seas me heartie...

[–] glowie@h4x0r.host 18 points 2 years ago

🏴‍☠😎

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

May it end with a whimper not a shout

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd pay for cable for the one/two (please God, two) months my team is in the playoffs.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think it will become that ..... cable TV will just become a live event channel for people .... sports, concerts, public events.

They'll stop using it to broadcast TV shows of any kind, including news programs because all of that can be streamed on the internet using modern systems and devices ..... why maintain old cable networks if people can just watch your programming when they want.

[–] ITypeWithMyDick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There are methods to watch to games live online, for free.

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah but not at the same quality. And my preferred game is hockey where high quality really makes a difference.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I feel like I've read this exact headline 20 times over the past couple of years.