I use Fennec/Firefox with the ublock plugin. How does that compare with cromite?
Open Source
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
EDIT: Looks like I'm wrong, Fennec is still maintained. Seems the difference is that Mull is more strict about privacy, which means more sites may not work.
Original comment:
I forget what it was, but I think Mull is the "better" Firefox flavor right now. Maybe Fennec is no longer maintained? Idk. Maybe it'll come up if you search it.
Cromite is different. It's based on chromium instead of Firefox. Mull (and maybe Fennec?) probably has better privacy overall. There's a comparison page somewhere out there.
Fennec IS maintained and receives regular updates.
I use Mull as well. I think it's a bit more heavy-handed than Fennec as far as I understand, so I think it comes down to how much convenience you're willing to give up for privacy/security. Both are a step in the right direction, though.
Much better, as Cromite still uses the Chromium engine, which is again Google.
Please do not use any Chromium forks if you care about privacy and an open web. Cromite uses the Chromium engine, which is by Google.
"But Chromium is open source, so that means good, no?": Not always. Developing a browser is very hard and requires a lot of time and resources. Therefore, even when you can fork Chromium in theory, maintaining this separate fork becomes incredibly difficult. Google of course does not allow any privacy centric code to be pushed to the Chromium codebase. It in fact, does the opposite. Look at the ManifestV3 drama for instance. The solution to all of this is using Firefox mobile or forks of it.
There are some security considerations to using a Firefox-based browser on Android. In my experience, performance and stability has not been as good on Firefox Android as Chromium Android.
What security considerations are you mentioning? The only slight drawbacks that I see in the listed source are privacy ones. Those too can be mitigated by extensions. In my experience, Fdroid Fennec has been very stable and decently fast.
per-site process isolation, as mentioned here: https://divestos.org/pages/browsers#processIsolation
My experience with several firefox-based browsers on Android was not usable, with constant freezes, crashes, and performance issues.
PrivacyBrowser ia great, except for all these shitty websites that dont load images (or anything at all) without JavaScript or other non-html fuckery