this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023

177 points (98.9% liked)

News

31457 readers

2996 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

177

An early version of Disney’s Mickey Mouse will enter the public domain on January 1 (www.cnn.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In just a few short days, an early version of Disney’s most iconic character will join the public domain for the first time.

For nearly a century, the image of Mickey Mouse has been married to the Walt Disney Company brand, but on January 1, 2024, Disney’s copyright of “Steamboat Willie,” Walt Disney’s first short film featuring Mickey Mouse, will expire.

That means that one of the company’s earliest iterations of its beloved rodent will become available for public use.

...

“Steamboat Willie” premiered in 1928, helping launch Mickey Mouse and Walt Disney into the stratosphere. Since US copyright law, which was last updated by Congress in 1998, allows copyright to be held for 95 years, Disney’s sole claim to the character is about to end.

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Walt Disney Company is not ready for the amount of Steamboat Love ❤️🛳️❤️🛳️❤️ that the Rule34 folks will throw at them. Hot Steampipe Action is on the menu, folks.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

You think copywrite has ever stopped rule 34 artists?

[+] MicroWave@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's why they quit fighting to get copyright law changed, they won what they wanted

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

Been saying this for years. Now that we have hours to go, maybe people will finally believe there's no hidden plan to extend copyright yet again.

[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When my kid did a play in middle school “The Little Mermaid” either there was an approved videographer or none were allowed, either way parents were told if they took cell phone footage the school would be sued.

I wonder if that kind of thing should fall under educational purposes?

[+] MicroWave@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can’t find the video by lawful masses explaining the specific components but if I recall correctly copyright is a bundle of rights.

You have and can sell, give or license them together or separately.

The right to reproduce/copy
The right to perform
The right to transmit
The right to create derivatives.

So, outside fair use which isn’t as slam dunk as people think and you still have to fight in court to prove you had a right at your own expense, copyright holders can give some rights but not others. And unless explicitly stated the rights can be assigned to you but you can’t grant them to others. E.g. the schools allowed to perform it, but can’t give rights to parents to record it.

You can make as many copies of my poem you want. But you can’t change the wording. (Limited reproduction allowed, derivatives not)

You print my poem in your book and change the wording but it can’t be streamed, projected, performed. (Reproduction, derivatives allowed, performance not)

You can perform my music on a stage with lyrics but you can’t let them be photocopied/streamed. (Performance allowed, reproduction not)

It all makes sense when the copyrights are for a short time. They’re meant to be a creative monopoly incentivizing people putting stuff out there and then it being part of the public domain after a time.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The Little Mermaid isn't copyrighted though...

Unless they pull Hans Christian Anderson out of his grave, I'm not sure they would have much standing to sue. The only way I could see a lawsuit is if they had exact imagery from the movie.

[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe it wasn’t the little mermaid? Or they were using the names. It was awhile ago, what stuck with me is we weren’t allowed to record the performance for that reason. Maybe I’d remember the play better if I had a video of it lol.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Haha

It could also very possibly be an overzealous administration who didn't want to deal with any possible issues. They maybe knew of the Disney version but we're not aware that most of Disney's biggest movies are from pre-copyright stories.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I can’t wait to start making my own Steamboat Willie cartoons! The Mouse may sue me for use of the name “Mickey” or some other bastardization of the copyright law, but it’s the principle of the thing!

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago

Make it educational, like how to perform a tracheostomy with a ballpoint pen.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

They would probably get you under trademark law. They use a clip of Steamboat Willie as their intro logo for things.