this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
172 points (99.4% liked)

memes

22701 readers
1 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China's gonna be a phenomenal world leader.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not 100% sure but I think the context for this comment is a very cool video of a Chinese solar panel plant in Afghanistan.

[–] jabrd@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Marxist-Leninists performing bourgeois revolutions better than any bourgeois party ever could

[–] SovietWaveGoddess@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Correction: Marxist Leninists performing the only revolutions better than anyone else could

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago
[–] SovietWaveGoddess@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Appreciation of socialism will follow China's assistance, so that might make things easier for people

[–] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

this thread is like the dengist version of reform or revolution

[–] CrimsonSage@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is just right communist economistic claptrap.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

...yes and no. On one hand, China could do more -- they could aid local communists, or at least local groups who are trying to improve women's rights specifically. On the other hand, much of the last century is riddled with examples of when even the good kind of more direct intervention backfires, especially in the context of an enemy in the U.S. who will seek to use anything and everything against China.

Take the "China should do more" idea to the extreme: China invades and installs a communist government. We should all see a million reasons why that would turn out badly.

[–] sourquincelog@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Women employed by a Taliban led government doesn't sound especially liberatory

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

deng-cowboy "howdy, what's going on in this thread?"

[–] DyingOfDeBordom@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The conclusion anyone who has played Victoria 3 would come to, once you have enough factories that all your peasants are employed you can't keep building more, but you gotta get landowner clout low enough that the dang aristocrats can't stop you from passing Propertied Women

[–] commiespammer@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Just build all your arms factories and barracks in your capital and demolish all your barracks everywhere else, then provoke a civil war, smh not that hard.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Afghanistan is preparing to counter another insurrection by “ISIS”. If they’re willing to recruit a bunch of men to fight while not training women to run the country when they’re out or dead, I’m not sure if the solution is as simple as “more consumerism”. Though more jobs may be helpful in combatting the allure of extremism for the mean time, but the liberation of anyone won’t happen from simply having high demand for production.

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

"Come with plows, tractors, and fertilizer..."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›