wait, capitalism means selling commodities?! 
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)
technology
23218 readers
2 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Who could have possibly known?
It's called freedom 
Wait they're a libertarian who believes in protectionist trade policy? Fucking what?
Libertarianism is an incoherent meme ideology, I would expect nothing less lol
no domestic battery production of course.
because selling raw materials has helped so many African countries get out of debt traps
Not a chance until the government can assure investors that it won’t just get nationalized the pay off other debts
Elon can demand that he accepts Elon Coin and jugs of milk as payment for the lithium
Well before Milei, there was the risk of Peronists nationalizing any investments made in the country. The Argentinians can either be a wealthier nation or they can keep sticking it to whoever they’re sticking it to and enjoy more poverty.
Nationalized commodity infrastructure is only acceptable for NATO members like Norway, I assume?
Norway is able to fund the process of extracting oil. Argentina isn’t able to fund the process of mining their natural resources. They can’t really fund anything, that’s their big issue. So a foreign investor could work with them to do so.
Not sure why you’re bringing NATO up. This is about whether or not a sovereign nation is able to extract their natural resources internally or not.