this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
105 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

73698 readers
3219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Race to Put Brain Implants in People Is Heating Up::Thanks in part to Elon Musk, the field of brain-computer interfaces has captured both public and investor interest, with a cadre of companies now developing implantable devices.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry, this version of i-plant is no longer supported. Please subscribe to a get a free replacement for your assisted eye sight, the premium option has no ads!

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You joke but they’re actually people running into that problem right now. A company that made bionic eyes shutdown and their users nolonger have support.

[–] Buttons@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Intellectual property" protection has gone too far. It should not be illegal to repair your own devices, it should not be illegal to reverse engineer and break encryption on your own devices. Intellectual property should be inseparable from public interest responsibilities. If you buy a movie (and have proof of such), then whoever owns the IP for the movie should be required to provide you with additional copies, and if the IP gets lost in the legal weeds, then the movie is no longer copyrighted and people can copy and distribute it freely.

As a society, we have no interest in making your rich just because you're a passive owner, you provide no benefit to society and society should provide no benefit to you. However, if you create a popular movie, and you distribute it and you take responsibility for ensuring that those who have purchased the movie are able to view it freely, then you are rendering a service to society and deserve to profit.

[–] DrWorm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Wasn't that specifically because the inventor and doctor died unexpectedly and he just didn't write any of that stuff down or train others on how the procedure was done?

[–] LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol 44 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah no. Smartphones have ruined our mental health and privacy enough I can't even imagine what an implant would do to us.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] drasticpotatoes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I love the idea of augmentation, but not from any corporation.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Free open source cybernetics will be the shit in like 40 years if humanity hasn't been completely wiped out by then.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 years ago

Just not super excited for the back alley ripperdocs

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Can't wait to debug and rice Arch OS on my brain chip

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Just in time for me to jack in at a retirement home!

[–] pendingdeletion@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

How would you feel about an implant being offered by an independent street vendor?

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Is this going to be like those neurotech implants for the ~deaf~ blind that the company went under and now the people get no service, support or anything?

https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-022-03810-5/index.html

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Unlikely. These implants require far less in terms of outside-the-body tech.

Also those people were blind, which is a whole other issue because you need external feedback processing.

Its novelty is that it doesn’t require open brain surgery. Instead, it’s implanted through a slit at the base of the neck and threaded up through the jugular vein into the motor cortex—the part of the brain that directs movement. The device is powered by a small battery pack placed under the skin of the chest. Synchron has implanted 10 patients, including six in a US feasibility trial supported by the Brain Initiative.

Being up to "cure" paralysis is a great thing.

[–] dmalteseknight@programming.dev 19 points 2 years ago

People seem to think it is a one time thing. But are you going to have invasive brain surgery every time you need a major upgrade because your current implants are no longer being supported?

[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I'm not getting anything put in my brain or otherwise until we get away from the current mindset of disposable electronics. Also not until I know its not going to be used to funnel ads into my brain.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks in part to Elon Musk

He wants to get one, too? Finally?

/s

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't fit with all the bullshit he currently stores there.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

These companies are more interested in the prestige of getting there first, and securing venture capital than the actual applications, implants, and patients.