I use DDG and it's fine? Just use a different search engine
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
1989 points (98.3% liked)
Memes
45581 readers
1 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
In my experience DDG and Google are pretty close to the same quality. IE neither is good.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Which is why I stopped going since about 4 years ago now. One day I just went to a different mall, and never looked back
load more comments
(6 replies)
The old "Bing is just like Google" ad copy is getting truer and truer in a bad way.
All the people complaining must not be using verbatim search (in search tools, toggle from "all results.")
Verbatim search? As in direct string comparison? What is this 1999?
This is such an apt analogy. I only use it because I have a couple hundred tabs open in Chrome and I am too lazy to port them all over to FF. Even then, I usually have to be really manipulative to the search algorithm to get what I want from general searches and heaven forbid I want to find something that is even the least but taboo. I just use DuckDuckGo for those searches, though it struggles sometimes too.
I know I need to swap over to FF entirely, but there is just so much, from shifting my PW bank to the hundreds of tabs and thousands of bookmarks. Does anyone know of any FOSS or FF extensions that can smooth that process?
Bit-warden for password manager, FOSS cross platform. FF should import all the bookmarks. I'd save all open tabs to a new bookmark folder before transfer then open that folder after.
load more comments
(2 replies)
This is why I have been using aselfhosted searxng instance for over a year and half now.
It's still just Google and ddg and whatnot though.,?
Like. There's only a few search engines. Bing. Google. Yandex. Yep.
I haven't found aggregating them with search to be even remotely useful because more garbage is still garbage
There is actually a lot more search engines that you might think, plus there are privacy frontends for them you can aggregate.
Edit: Also the main poin't of searxng is to use it as a proxy for them which hepps if you use an instance with multiple users, or host an instance for you and your friends for example.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
This post but replace google search with the general internet.
Nearly every place that feels like the old internet is not as popular.
I used to think that was a bad thing, I'm starting to think maybe I've just been pushing aside the reality that when the internet was good, it wasn't as popular.
Not popular- commercial. The early internet had effectively no profit motive. As it aged there was a modicum of balance between use and profit - a good site drives customers. Now there are a preponderance of sites which exist only to scrape pennies off advertisers and have no useful content except that which is required to garner a click from a search engine in hopes you will accidentally create an advertising impression.
load more comments
(1 replies)
ITT: people who don't know that DuckDuckGo is just Bing with a bird on it
load more comments
(2 replies)
Tor Browser is planning to remove Google from the search engine options a user can choose: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/41835
There some say brave onion + no JS is good: https://search.brave4u7jddbv7cyviptqjc7jusxh72uik7zt6adtckl5f4nwy2v72qd.onion/
Mullvad team seems to be considering 4 possible options:
- Startpage: https://www.startpage.com/
- Mojeek: https://www.mojeek.com/
- Brave Search: https://search.brave.com/
- Metager: https://metager.org/
PS: Not disgussing ddg / ddg onion too much, basically because ddg is the long-time default search engine of TB. Most TB users assume ddg is a decent, standard, generic option, esp. its non-JS version.